10.01.2015 Views

Download full PDF - UBC Medical Journal

Download full PDF - UBC Medical Journal

Download full PDF - UBC Medical Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

YEAR 3<br />

While undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging, 26<br />

schizophrenia patients and 26 control subjects completed 90<br />

association tasks (i.e., they were provided a cue word, and were<br />

required to choose the more strongly associated of two companion<br />

words). Following scanning, subjects were asked to free-recall and<br />

cue-recall the word pairs viewed in the scanner. Using constrained<br />

principal component analysis with a finite impulse response basis<br />

set, three statistically significant components of neural activity<br />

emerged. Component 1 involved activity in left inferior parietal<br />

lobe, left superior temporal gyrus, bilateral visual cortices and<br />

dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). Component 2 showed<br />

activity in dACC/supplementary motor area, visual cortices,<br />

and left premotor cortex. Component 3 showed deactivation in<br />

medial prefrontal cortices and posterior cingulate/precuneus. For<br />

all components, encoding words that were later not recalled was<br />

associated with higher activation or deactivation than encoding<br />

free- or cue-recalled words; and encoding cue-recalled words<br />

showed higher activation or deactivation than encoding freerecalled<br />

words. For components 1 and 3, schizophrenia patients<br />

exhibited less activation or deactivation than control subjects<br />

when encoding cue-recalled words (p < .05). Greater activity<br />

when encoding non-recalled words, or those only recalled when<br />

cued, may reflect increased difficulty or interference at the<br />

encoding stage. The differences in activity of these components<br />

observed in schizophrenia patients may help elucidate the<br />

variations in associative memory function thought to underlie<br />

many characteristic features of this disease.<br />

Are the Eyes the Windows to the<br />

Human Soul Gaze Direction Study and<br />

its Effects on Attentional Orienting and<br />

Crossmodal Target Responses<br />

Jennifer Quan, Salvador Soto-Faraco, John McDonald,<br />

Alan Kingstone<br />

Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia<br />

Objective: Human beings are highly social creatures who use<br />

verbal and body language to communicate. Eye contact is a<br />

powerful means of communication. The following 7 experiments<br />

attempts to determine the degree in which the eyes illicit reflexive<br />

responses in human senses from visual, auditory, and tactile<br />

responses; and hopes to answer the age-old question of whether<br />

the eyes are the windows to the soul.<br />

Methodology: A schematic face was shown on a computer screen,<br />

with eyes that were either spatially informative (looked towards the<br />

target) or spatially uninformative (looked in the opposite direction<br />

of the target). Participants were instructed to press either the left<br />

or right button depending on where they thought the visual target<br />

appeared. To measure the effect of eye-gaze on auditory attention,<br />

sound, rather than a visual target, was used as the target. Again,<br />

the participants were asked to input where they thought the sound<br />

originated (left or right). To measure tactile response, the schematic<br />

face was replaced by 4 dots that flashed on the left or right of the<br />

screen. Participants were again asked to input on the response pad<br />

where they thought the sound originated (left or right). Response<br />

times and accuracy were measured for all the experiments.<br />

Results: Eye-gaze cuing produced a shift in visual attention, as<br />

supported by faster response times in the valid trials (when the<br />

eyes pointed towards the visual cues) than in the invalid trials<br />

(when the eyes did not point towards the visual cues) with a<br />

p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!