Peer Review Presentation - UBC Medical Journal

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Reasons Reviewers Accept Manuscripts • Timely and relevant to a current problem • Well written, logical, and easy to comprehend • Study well designed and had appropriate methodology (p. 93) Provenzale, J.M., & Stanley, R.J. (2006). A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 34(2): 92-99. Originally published in American Journal of Roentgenology, 2005.
Reasons Reviewers Reject Manuscripts • Incomplete or insufficiently described statistics • Overinterpretation of the results • Suboptimal or insufficiently described means of measuring data • Sample population too small or biased* • Text difficult to follow • Insufficient problem statement (p. 93) Provenzale, J.M., & Stanley, R.J. (2006). A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 34(2): 92-99. Originally published in American Journal of Roentgenology, 2005.
Page 1 and 2: Writing and Reviewing for Medical J
Page 3 and 4: Purpose of Peer Review To ensure: 1
Page 5 and 6: Dual Role of the Reviewer Author ad
Page 7 and 8: Reviewer Responsibilities 1. Provid
Page 9 and 10: Golden Rule “Treat all manuscript
Page 11 and 12: Format of Review Two parts to a rev
Page 13 and 14: Non-Informative Reviews The “snap
Page 15: Non-Informative Reviews The “hidd
Page 19: Resources Budgell, Brian S. (2009).

Peer Review Presentation - UBC Medical Journal

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?