12.01.2015 Views

final-program-12-23-14-3

final-program-12-23-14-3

final-program-12-23-14-3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Tuesday afternoon<br />

Session IC: An Introduction to<br />

Physical Sciences Education<br />

Advocacy<br />

100<br />

Location: Grande Ballroom C<br />

Sponsor: AAPT<br />

Date: Tuesday, January 6<br />

Time: 3:30–4 p.m.<br />

Presider: Aline McNaull<br />

IC01: 3:30-3:40 p.m. How Policymakers Work on STEM<br />

Education Issues<br />

Contributed – Aline McNaull, American Institute of Physics, One Physics<br />

Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3843; amcnaull@aip.org<br />

Scott Franklin, Rochester Institute of Technology<br />

Tyler Glembo, American Physical Society<br />

Noah Finkelstein, University of Colorado<br />

This talk will provide an overview on the policy process and will<br />

describe how Congress and the Administration approach science,<br />

technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education policy<br />

issues. Participants will learn how issues are introduced and debated<br />

on Capitol Hill and what steps occur as ideas become laws. Examples<br />

of arguments for and against funding for science education will be<br />

presented. The current Administration is very focused on STEM<br />

education and the talk will provide an outline of some of the STEM<br />

education initiatives and objectives. Also discussed will be how<br />

policymakers receive advice from the stakeholder community then<br />

work to implement suggestions as they address problems and seek to<br />

change regulations.<br />

IC02:<br />

3:40-3:50 p.m. Why and How to Get Involved in Advocacy<br />

Contributed – Aline McNaull, American Institute of Physics, One Physics<br />

Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3843; amcnaull@aip.org<br />

Scott Franklin, Rochester Institute of Technology<br />

Tyler Glembo, American Physical Society<br />

Noah Finkelstein, University of Colorado<br />

This talk will discuss the rationale, purpose and mechanics of advocacy.<br />

What are some desired results of getting involved in advocacy<br />

Some examples of recent advocacy efforts will be provided as a part<br />

of a discussion about how to communicate with policymakers. Resources<br />

will be discussed which will allow participants to understand<br />

how to setup and have successful meetings. Questions about appropriate<br />

messaging will be addressed in an interactive dialogue. Information<br />

on how to draft appropriate handouts will also be included and<br />

participants will gain an understanding of the resources available<br />

within the scientific society community.<br />

IC03: 3:50-4 p.m. Current Topics In STEM Education Policy<br />

Contributed – Aline McNaull, American Institute of Physics, One Physics<br />

Ellipse, College Park, MD 20740-3843; amcnaull@aip.org<br />

Scott Franklin, Rochester Institute of Technology<br />

Tyler Glembo, American Physical Society<br />

Noah Finkelstein, University of Colorado<br />

This interactive discussion will include critiques of current approaches<br />

to STEM education issues. As policymakers seek to address state and<br />

local education issues through federal policy decisions, they are faced<br />

with choices about regulations, providing guidance to States, and allocating<br />

appropriate funding. This talk will address how the stakeholder<br />

community can develop effective messages to participate in dialogues<br />

with policymakers. Examples will be provided and the audience will<br />

have a chance to practice crafting a message about science education<br />

policy issues. Session participants will be able to engage with others<br />

and ask questions about current topics in STEM education policy.<br />

Session PST3: Post Deadline<br />

Posters<br />

Location: Grande Ballroom A<br />

Sponsor: AAPT<br />

Date: Tuesday, January 6<br />

Time: 3:30–5 p.m.<br />

Persons with odd-numbered posters will present their posters from<br />

3:30–4:15 p.m.; even-numbered will present 4:15–5 p.m.<br />

PST3A01: 3:30-4:15 p.m. Is Angular Displacement a Vector<br />

Quantity<br />

Poster – William A. Dittrich, Portland Community College, SY ST 3<strong>12</strong><br />

PO Box 19000, Portland, OR 97219; tdittric@pcc.edu<br />

A fundamental aspect of rotational motion has been found to be false.<br />

This casts the entire subjects of rotational kinematics and dynamics<br />

into doubt unless the mistake is corrected. The vector nature of<br />

angular velocity, acceleration, torque, and angular momentum are<br />

then in jeopardy of becoming scalars, which would have disastrous<br />

effects on the entire structure of physics. A new vector definition of<br />

angular displacement is introduced, preserving the vector nature of all<br />

quantities mentioned above. From this new definition, all subsequent<br />

rotational kinematic and dynamic equations can be derived, and it<br />

improves and completes the symmetry between rotational and linear<br />

equations. This new definition of angular displacement is the subject<br />

of a submitted paper to The Physics Teacher, and will be described and<br />

discussed at this poster session.<br />

PST3A02:<br />

4:15-5 p.m. Bouncing Ball Lab Introduces Models and<br />

Foreshadow Future Physics Concepts<br />

Poster – Lee S. Trampleasure, Carondelet High School, 690 Athens St.,<br />

San Francisco, CA 941<strong>12</strong>; lee@trampleasure.net<br />

In my high school physics classes (both AP and college prep), I begin<br />

with a lab that challenges students to determine how high a ball will<br />

bounce if dropped from 1.5 meters, but they only have the ball and<br />

one meter stick. We develop procedures as a class, then they collect<br />

data, analyze it, and make their prediction. After testing their prediction,<br />

they all get greater than 90% accuracy, showing that physics<br />

experiments can work! But then they are asked to calculate how high<br />

the ball will bounce if dropped from 5 meters, and we test this from<br />

the second floor next to a stairway. Their accuracy tends to correlate<br />

to the density of the ball. This leads to questions, which foreshadow<br />

terminal velocity, air resistance, and energy concepts. When we address<br />

these topics in the future, we always return to the ball lab. My<br />

curriculum follows the Modeling Instruction pedagogy.<br />

PST3A03: 3:30-4:15 p.m. Formscanner: Open-source Solution to<br />

Processing Bubble Forms<br />

Poster Chadwick H. Young Nicholls State University P.O. Box 2022<br />

Thibodaux, LA 70301 chad.young@nicholls.edu<br />

Alberto Borsetta OverIT, Information Technology<br />

Glenn V. Lo Nicholls State University<br />

Kaisa E. Young Nicholls State University<br />

The multiple-choice exam remains a staple for many introductory<br />

physics courses. Grading these exams typically involves a scanner<br />

enabled with optical mark recognition software. However, these tools<br />

are often inflexible and prohibitively expensive. Formscanner is a<br />

new open-source software--free and without advertising--created to<br />

process multiple-choice “bubble” forms. With just a few simple steps,<br />

faculty can scan, interpret, and analyze the results from multiplechoice<br />

exams.<br />

PST3A04: 4:15-5 p.m. Exercises for Connecting Math Methods<br />

Topics to Physical Problems<br />

Poster – Gary Felder, Smith College Clark Science Center, Northampton,<br />

MA 0163-0001; gfelder@smith.edu<br />

WINTER MEETING<br />

JANUARY 3-6<br />

2015<br />

SAN DIEGO, CA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!