University of Maryland

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Two different contrastive hierarchies: a. [high] > [labial] b. [labial] > [high] [–high] [+high] [–labial] [+labial] /a/ [–labial] [+labial] [–high] [+high] /u/ /i/ /u/ /a/ /i/ We might expect that the two vowel systems will pattern differently. For example, system (a) might show alternations or neutralization between /i/ and /u/; in system (b) /i/ might be more closely related to /a/. 42
Diagnosing vowel harmony CHILDES transcripts (need sane orthography) Turkish need a comparison non-VH (e.g. Polish) (Auto)correlation between adjacent vowels Compare same and different vowels within- and between- utterances 43
Page 1 and 2:
Making Phonological Decisions Willi
Page 3 and 4: 3 topics Finding vowel categories/f
Page 5 and 6: Long-term Memory Audition Articulat
Page 7 and 8: Using Statistics Magic! Data summar
Page 9 and 10: Finding phonemes 9
Page 11 and 12: Recursive binary divisions. Dresher
Page 13 and 14: Classical Manchu Vowels Contrastive
Page 33 and 34: 100 75 50 25 0 100 -150 -137.5 -125
Page 35 and 36: 100 100 75 75 50 50 25 25 b p 0 0 -
Page 37 and 38: 100 100 75 75 50 50 poor discrimina
Page 39 and 40: Greek Vowels F1 x F2 space for Gree
Page 41 and 42: Learning from the Primordial soup E
Page 43 and 44: English: Peterson and Barney 3000 F
Page 45 and 46: Normalization Don’t use F1 and F2
Page 47 and 48: Ratio with F3 ANOVA F1/F3 0.40 0.30
Page 49 and 50: Best split for front 0.9 How compac
Page 51 and 52: Look for phonological activity. Dre
Page 53: Frequent frames Mintz 41
Page 57 and 58: Not done Cue for vowel harmony not
Page 59 and 60: Finding words 47
Page 61 and 62: “UG, statistics or both” Look b
Page 63 and 64: Bayes! Johnson 51
Page 65 and 66: Bayesian phonology p(UR|SR) = p(SR|
Page 67 and 68: a ï o u e i ö ü a ï o u e i ö
Page 69 and 70: Discussion 57
Page 71: Detail Multi-resolution Both coarse
show all

University of Maryland

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?