March/April - Broadband Communities Magazine

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Cottage-style developments are the newest trend in off-campus student living. Combining many facets of new urbanism, a cottage student development is essentially a neighborhood of duplexes and Colorado-style homes (houses with open floor plans centered around large living spaces) leased by the bed. Some recent cottage developments include single-family homes intermixed with three- to sixunit attached homes or even traditional multifamily buildings. Every cottage development has a clubhouse that offers amenities on a par with any multifamily development. In the fall of 2011, Aspen Heights – a company founded with the goal of revolutionizing student living – approached RealPage with an interesting challenge: provide its residents with the same highspeed Internet access (HSIA) as multifamily developments without breaking the bank. The company had two new cottage-style developments under way. • Aspen Heights Auburn will include 123 homes, 206 units and 600 beds and be served by Knology. • Aspen Heights San Antonio will have 172 homes, 284 units and 844 beds and be served by Time Warner Cable. In building cottage developments, developers hope to blend the best aspects of purpose-built student housing and traditional single-family neighborhoods. For more than a decade, almost all purposebuilt student multifamily communities have used highly managed Ethernet networks to provide wired and wireless HSIA to residents. In a typical student building, a fiber backbone runs to build- Owners Corner Cottage-Style Broadband Aspen Heights ups the ante at student cottage-style developments by providing HSIA services as good as or better than those in traditional multifamily buildings – contrary to conventional wisdom. By Henry Pye ■ RealPage Inc. from BCR/IDF (2) Strands SM fiber (1) series 6 coaxial ing or riser closets, and Cat 5e cables feed each unit. The solution is similar to what is used in local area networks (LANs) in fiber-fed commercial buildings. Ethernet, outfitted with managed switches and access points, has repeatedly proved to be the most cost-effective way to provide HSIA. However, the cost of running fiber to more than 100 structures, not to mention the expense of as many closets or surface-mounted enclosures, has been considered prohibitive about the author Henry Pye is vice president of resident technology services for RealPage (www.realpage. com). He can be reached at henry.pye@realpage.com. 10 | BROADBAND COMMUNITIES | www.broadbandcommunities.com | March/april 2012 28” 8 Data or IP TV Drops to Outlets (if a duplex) Vented Cover (space for managed switch) 120v Duplex 6 Video Drops to Outlets (1) category 5e (1) series 6 coaxial (1) category 5e Living Room Bedroom Desk Data Video Data (1) category 5e (1) series 6 coaxial Kitchen Data 6” above cabinet Closest to middle of unit Bedroom Dresser Figure 1: Each building in a cottage-style development has its own wiring closet – a combination communications room and distribution panel. Video for cottage developments. Instead, the sorts of cable modem or xDSL solutions used in neighborhoods of single-family homes were believed to be the best options for cottage developments. All a cottage developer needed to do was provide the phone or cable company with access to the joint trench, and the community would be ready to provide HSIA to its residents. Unfortunately, although cable and DSL services are well-suited for single-
family homes and conventional multifamily communities, there is a reason these services struggle in student multifamily communities. Cable modem and xDSL solutions are simply not as highly manageable. Student living is the most challenging environment in which to provide wired and wireless HSIA, and many cottage developments have run into the same problems that previously caused student multifamily communities to move to Ethernet delivery. TaCKlING THe CosT IssUe Still, wouldn’t building an Ethernet network for a cottage-style community be far too expensive? To be candid, we at Real- Page had our doubts. We had proposals in hand that quoted more than $750,000 for the fiber alone based on traditional multifamily designs. Thus, although we had many questions, we knew the Ethernet needed to be laid out differently if we were to have any hope of an affordable solution. With the help of hardworking contractors Mike Kolb and Scott Hart, and of Chris Bowman and David Lippke at the managed Internet service firm Korcett, we first isolated the primary cost drivers of an Ethernet buildout and then crafted a layout focused on reducing the most expensive components. Although most people look at the open spaces of a cottage development as a problem for low-voltage layouts, we embraced open space as a blank slate without many of the pathway constraints of multifamily construction. Figure 1 shows the basic wiring layout of each home. Although there are subtle differences due to unit mix, local code and home design differences, we essentially combined the typical apartment distribution panel and building communications room from a typical multifamily development. A managed switch is placed in the bottom of a vented 28-inch panel in each home to serve one or more units. A managed access point is placed above the cabinets in the kitchen. Each panel is fed directly by two strands of fiber. So far, the cost of wiring a unit is comparable to that in a typical multifamily student development. However, the fiber Owners Corner Ethernet’s manageability makes it a cost-effective choice for providing Internet services in student housing, even if cabling and data equipment are more expensive. and data equipment cost is still at least twice that of a multifamily student development, even though we were able to slash the cost to a fraction of the original estimates. We believed the increase in the speed and quality of the HSIA services would have justified the additional cost of fiber and electronics – but, thankfully, we never had to find out. FTTB less expeNsIVe THaN CaBle Unsure about whether we would succeed in designing a cost-effective Ethernet layout, we simultaneously drafted layouts and solicited offers for cable modem solutions from the same cable company partners. In all cases, the speeds were slower, and in only one case was there any wireless option – yet the pricing for cable modem solutions was more expensive. As a result, the developments had better service with the fiber and Ethernet solution and, at worst, broke even on price. Additional modeling seems to verify this cost advantage for most cottage developments with four or fewer beds per unit. These two cottage developments will open in summer 2012. In addition to high-quality wired and wireless HSIA, each community also provides a digital cable TV package. Moreover, the management teams will enjoy the Ethernet-enabled tools now common in multifamily student communities: The management teams have access to the wireless network throughout the community for operations. They can message every resident via HSIA, receiving acknowledgements with date and time stamps. Management can also slow down HSIA for individual residents who fail to pay their rent on time or otherwise violate their leases. Finally, although we are thrilled by the assistance and quality of service from our cable company partners at both developments, we also look forward to the cottage developments opening in 2013, where student housing industry stalwarts such as Pavlov and Airwaves will be competing to provide bulk and premium video and HSIA over the same infrastructure. v Why Cable Is a More expensIve optIon Although Ethernet is generally considered superior for providing highspeed Internet to student living communities, cable modems have historically been considered a cheaper option. Today, this is less often the case. Of the many factors that increase the cost of cable modem solutions in student living, support costs may be the most significant. Put simply, cable modems are a less manageable mechanism for providing data services. In single-family homes, where tenancy is measured in years, investing in a truck roll or two to set up service for a home is cost-effective. However, when 700-plus 18- to 21-year-old residents move in over a period of a few days and stay for 51 weeks, a couple of truck rolls per residence is a nightmare. That cable companies charge more for cable modems at the same service levels is unsurprising, considering that cable modem deployments are more expensive to support than Ethernet deployments. Cable modems can be costeffective, but usually only at lower service levels. As a result, cable modems are a poor choice for most purpose-built student living communities. March/april 2012 | www.broadbandcommunities.com | BROADBAND COMMUNITIES | 11
Page 2 and 3: GIVE YOUR RESIDENTS THE POWER OF Fi
Page 4 and 5: EDITORIAL DIRECTOR Scott DeGarmo PU
Page 6 and 7: DEPARTMENTS editor’s Note . . . .
Page 8 and 9: 1101010010_THE_BANDWIDTH_HAWK_01011
Page 10 and 11: Provider Perspective Hungry for a N
Page 14 and 15: FTTH deploymenTs Highlights From th
Page 16 and 17: Io VIStA ApArtmeNtS, loS ANGeleS By
Page 18 and 19: The housing community is colocated
Page 20 and 21: mdU sHoWCAse Fiber pathways preserv
Page 22 and 23: MDU Technology mDU Solutions For el
Page 24 and 25: FTTH IndUsTRy leAdeRs Q&A With pedr
Page 26 and 27: most cases we’ve been successful
Page 28 and 29: FTTH IndUsTRy leAdeRs Q&A With Heat
Page 30 and 31: The mood at the European FTTH Confe
Page 32 and 33: FTTH ConFeRenCe mUnICH The European
Page 34 and 35: HoT pRodUCTs BroadBand Communities
Page 36 and 37: ogy, which ensures reliable install
Page 38 and 39: C M Y CM MY CY CMY K output version
Page 40 and 41: and vaults, the SCD Case sets the s
Page 42 and 43: lion residential and commercial cus
Page 44 and 45: Mesh Networks, The 11757 Katy Freew
Page 46 and 47: SON deploys only secure, carrier-gr
Page 48 and 49: Tellabs Inc. 1415 West Diehl Rd. Na
Page 50 and 51: IndependenT TelCos more than 600 In
Page 52 and 53: states, they must form CLEC subsidi
Page 54 and 55: One independent telco, Hancock Tele
Page 56 and 57: lessons FRom THe FIeld tales From t
Page 58 and 59: mIddle-mIle neTWoRks Unique partner
Page 60 and 61: Groundbreaking for the Rural Nebras
Page 62 and 63:
TeCHnology passive optical lAN For
Page 64:
Conventional wiring for data and vo
Page 67 and 68:
TeCHnology Fig. 1: VDSL2 vectoring
Page 69 and 70:
Your FTTH/Smart Grid Engineering &
Page 71 and 72:
speed Internet access. I am exhibit
Page 74 and 75:
I P T V Getting Started With Video
Page 77 and 78:
BROADBAND COMMUNITIES Marketplace T
show all

March/April - Broadband Communities Magazine

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?