Conspectus, vol. 10.pdf - South African Theological Seminary
Conspectus, vol. 10.pdf - South African Theological Seminary
Conspectus, vol. 10.pdf - South African Theological Seminary
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Scarborough, ‘Christian Transformational Leadership’<br />
and ability to strategize guarantee that he or she will be influential<br />
(or transformational) to achieve shared goals. 17<br />
With a definition now in hand, it should be helpful, in conclusion, to<br />
sketch just why a definition of Christian Transformational Leadership<br />
should be important. That is, it would be in the interests of further<br />
research to sketch its possible application.<br />
7. Application of the Definition<br />
There are at least three major reasons why a definition of Christian<br />
Transformational Leadership should be important.<br />
Firstly, in recent decades, semantic critique has grown in importance,<br />
not least through the popularity of the method of deconstruction. This<br />
may rely heavily on the definition of terms (Blackburn 2005:90), and<br />
provides a powerful means of analysis (Scarborough 2009:3). With this<br />
in mind, a definition of Christian Transformational Leadership would<br />
represent an important starting point for semantic critique.<br />
Secondly, dropout from Christian ministry (which is an important<br />
aspect of Christian leadership) is very high—up to 95 percent. 18 The<br />
selected literature repeatedly points to a high dropout from Christian<br />
leadership in general (e.g. Blackaby and Blackaby 2001:19, 45, 230;<br />
CSwinton 1989:328, 356; Gibbs 2005:19). Christian Transformational<br />
Leadership exists within this context, and its presence is not small, as<br />
17<br />
Again, the term ‘transformational’ is merely used for context here. The term<br />
‘influence’ is preferred, because it is far more common in the literature.<br />
18<br />
According to Chun (2007:2), dropout in the USA may be as high as ninety-five<br />
percent, while Gibbs (2005:79) gives a figure of fifty percent dropout from localchurch<br />
ministry in the USA during the first ten years. If dropout should remain<br />
constant over the duration of ministry, Gibbs comes to within two percent of Chun.<br />
78