The Philippines - Economic Growth - usaid
The Philippines - Economic Growth - usaid
The Philippines - Economic Growth - usaid
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SOUTHEAST ASIA COMMERCIAL LAW & INSTITUTIONAL REFORM AND TRADE DIAGNOSTICS JULY 2007<br />
THE PHILIPPINES<br />
freedom of the party to make their own arrangements to resolve their disputes.” 62 Section 25 states that<br />
“[i]n interpreting the Act, the court shall have due regard to the policy of the law in favor of arbitration.”<br />
Several international actors, including USAID’s Legal Accountability and Dispute Resolution Project,<br />
helped craft the Act.<br />
<strong>The</strong> ADRA represents a major step toward institutionalizing ADR as part of the Philippine legal<br />
architecture. <strong>The</strong> ADRA modified the previous major arbitration law enacted in 1953, and provides more<br />
guidance for international arbitration than the 1953 law. As stated in the ADRA, however, domestic<br />
arbitration shall continue to be governed by the 1953 law as amended by the ADRA. 63 Importantly, that<br />
chapter of the law incorporates in domestic arbitration many of the elements that apply to international<br />
arbitration. 64<br />
International Commercial Arbitration (ICA) is governed by chapter 4 of the ADRA, which states that the<br />
UN’s Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration will control the arbitration process. 65 Chapter<br />
4 adopts a broad definition of “commercial”; it appears several types of international disputes will be<br />
subject to the Act. 66 (“An arbitration is ‘commercial’ if it covers matters arising from all relationships of<br />
a commercial nature, whether contractual or not.”) Chapter 4 leaves open for interpretation several issues<br />
regarding its relationship to the UN’s Model Law. <strong>The</strong>se issues, relating to how the Model Law will be<br />
interpreted in the <strong>Philippines</strong>, presumably will be decided by the Supreme Court. 67<br />
<strong>The</strong> ADRA also governs the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, and states that the<br />
UN Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York<br />
Convention) applies. 68 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Philippines</strong> acceded to the New York Convention in 1958, but the ADRA<br />
provides domestic implementing legislation for it. Foreign arbitral awards, when confirmed by the<br />
relevant Regional Trial Court in the <strong>Philippines</strong>, shall be enforced “in the same manner as final and<br />
executory decisions of courts of law of the <strong>Philippines</strong>.” 69 With this language, the ADRA distinguishes<br />
foreign arbitral awards from foreign judgments. 70 Decisions by Regional Trial Courts with respect to<br />
foreign arbitral awards may be appealed to the Court of Appeals. 71<br />
Like the chapter on mediation, chapter 4 also provides for confidentiality of the proceedings. Section 23<br />
states that the “arbitration proceedings, including the records, evidence and the arbitral award, shall be<br />
confidential and shall not be published except (1) with the consent of the parties, or (2) for the limited<br />
purpose of disclosing to the court relevant documents in cases where resort to the court is allowed<br />
62 R.A. 9285 (Apr. 2, 2004)<br />
63 ADRA Sec. 32.<br />
64 Id. at Sec. 33.<br />
65 Id. at Sec. 19.<br />
66 Id. at Sec. 21.<br />
67 See Leslie Chew, “<strong>The</strong> New Philippine Arbitration Law: Some Preliminary Observations,” 31 J. Integrated Bar of the<br />
<strong>Philippines</strong> 75, 77 (2005).<br />
68 Id. at Sec. 42.<br />
69 Id. at A Sec. 44.<br />
70 See id. “A foreign arbitral award when confirmed by a court of a foreign country, shall be recognized and enforced as a<br />
foreign arbitral award and not a judgment of a foreign court.”<br />
71 Id. at Sec. 46.<br />
65