22.01.2015 Views

Immigrants and the Right to Petition - NYU Law Review

Immigrants and the Right to Petition - NYU Law Review

Immigrants and the Right to Petition - NYU Law Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Imaged with <strong>the</strong> Permission of N.Y.U. School of <strong>Law</strong><br />

NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW<br />

[Vol. 78:667<br />

5. Alien, Sedition, <strong>and</strong> Naturalization Act <strong>Petition</strong>s, 1798-1804<br />

A different sort of noncitizen petitioning was prompted by congressional<br />

enactment of anti-immigrant legislation in 1798.261 The<br />

Alien Act empowered <strong>the</strong> President <strong>to</strong> deport any noncitizen he<br />

judged <strong>to</strong> be a danger <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> public or suspected of conspiring against<br />

<strong>the</strong> government. 262 The Sedition Act criminalized, among o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

things, "unlawful assembly" <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> publication of false or malicious<br />

writing against <strong>the</strong> government. 263 The Alien Enemies Act, which remains<br />

in force, authorizes <strong>the</strong> President during wartime <strong>to</strong> arrest, imprison,<br />

or deport noncitizens deemed dangerous. 264 Finally, <strong>the</strong><br />

Naturalization Act significantly extended <strong>the</strong> residency requirements<br />

for obtaining citizenship. 2 65<br />

One his<strong>to</strong>rian of early American petitioning described <strong>the</strong>se enactments<br />

as <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r "creat[ing] <strong>the</strong> first minor flood of petitions <strong>to</strong><br />

descend upon Congress," 2 66 both for a general repeal <strong>and</strong> for individual<br />

relief. The laws were immediately controversial <strong>and</strong> not just with<br />

<strong>the</strong> Jeffersonian opponents of <strong>the</strong> Federalists. The Virginia <strong>and</strong> Kentucky<br />

Resolves famously condemned <strong>the</strong> Alien <strong>and</strong> Sedition Acts, 267<br />

<strong>the</strong> Supreme Court has termed <strong>the</strong>m unconstitutional, 68 <strong>and</strong> contemporary<br />

scholars nearly uniformly view <strong>the</strong>m as such. 269<br />

261 For an account of <strong>the</strong> debates that produced <strong>the</strong>se statutes, see Neuman, supra note<br />

73, at 52-60.<br />

262 Act of June 25, 1798, ch. 58, 1 Stat. 570, 570-71.<br />

263 Act of July 14, 1798, ch. 74, 1 Stat. 596, 596-97.<br />

264 Act of July 6, 1798, ch. 66, 1 Stat. 577 (current version at 50 U.S.C. §§ 21-23 (2000)).<br />

265 In 1795, Congress had established a five-year residency requirement for <strong>the</strong> naturalization<br />

of a "free white person," Act of Jan. 29, 1795, ch. 20, 1 Stat. 414, but <strong>the</strong> Federalists,<br />

seeking <strong>to</strong> maintain political power <strong>and</strong> concluding that noncitizens were a significant<br />

source of antifederalist sentiment, extended <strong>the</strong> rule <strong>to</strong> a fourteen-year residency requirement.<br />

Act of June 18, 1798, ch. 54, 1 Stat. 566. See Neuman, supra note 73, at 52-53<br />

(describing Federalist reaction <strong>to</strong> "importation of dangerous revolutionary ideas from<br />

France"). The Naturalization Act of 1798 was repealed in 1802. Act of Apr. 14, 1802, ch.<br />

28, 2 Stat. 153. The five-year residency requirement was res<strong>to</strong>red <strong>and</strong> remains <strong>the</strong> basic<br />

rule. See 8 U.S.C. § 1427(a) (2000).<br />

266 Don L. Smith, The <strong>Right</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Petition</strong> for Redress of Grievances: Constitutional Development<br />

<strong>and</strong> Interpretation 112 (1971) (unpublished dissertation, available at Univ. Microfilms<br />

Int'l, 1986).<br />

267 See Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Resolutions of 1798, reprinted in 4 Debates on <strong>the</strong><br />

Adoption of <strong>the</strong> Federal Constitution 528 (pho<strong>to</strong>. reprint 1941) (Jonathan Elliot ed., 2d ed.<br />

Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott 1888) [hereinafter Debates on Adoption]; Thomas Jefferson,<br />

Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 <strong>and</strong> 1799, reprinted in Debates on Adoption, supra, at 540.<br />

268 N.Y. Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 276 (1964) ("Although <strong>the</strong> Sedition Act was<br />

never tested in this Court, <strong>the</strong> attack upon its validity has carried <strong>the</strong> day in <strong>the</strong> court of<br />

his<strong>to</strong>ry."); see also Lee v. Weisman, 505 U.S. 577, 626 (1992) (Souter, J., concurring)<br />

(describing Alien <strong>and</strong> Sedition Acts as "patently unconstitutional by modern st<strong>and</strong>ards").<br />

269 See, e.g., Sullivan, 376 U.S. at 276 (ga<strong>the</strong>ring sources); Larry Kramer, Underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

Federalism, 47 V<strong>and</strong>. L. Rev. 1485, 1519 (1994) (describing Alien <strong>and</strong> Sedition Acts as<br />

"about as clear an example of unconstitutional legislation as one could find").

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!