Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
encroachments on forest land in the garb of tribals and forest dwellers". In fact, claim officials, they are<br />
already getting reports of fresh encroachment from Maharashtra.<br />
So far, they have got no response from the PM's office. What has come out is a response from the<br />
Campaign for Survival and Dignity, which officially espouses the tribal cause. It condemns the<br />
"misinformation" and "false alarm" and claims that the best forests are in tribal areas, while 60% of the<br />
forests under the environment and forest ministry's charge has been reduced to wastelands. Within the<br />
ministry, however, genuine concerns forced the unprecedented hardline stance of completely rejecting the<br />
draft Bill. In a recent representation to the PM, the <strong>Indian</strong> Forest Service Association's Delhi unit followed it<br />
up and sought a relook at the Bill. They say it will mean the country can never hope to achieve its target of<br />
33% forest and tree cover and it will lead to a further loss of prime wildlife habitat, putting a question mark<br />
even on national parks and sanctuaries — a sensitive issue since concerns on the tiger brought it to the<br />
fore. (Times of India 23/4/05)<br />
UPA's Tribal Bill: Tiger’s death warrant (6)<br />
New Delhi: IF THE PMO and UPA have their way and The Scheduled Tribes (Recognition of Forest<br />
Rights) Bill, <strong>2005</strong>, is passed this Parliament session, India stands to lose 60 per cent of its forest cover.<br />
Under the proposed Act, each nuclear family of a forest-dwelling Scheduled Tribes will be given land up to<br />
2.5 hectares. It's estimated that once the land is doled out, over 60 per cent of India's forests would be<br />
handed over to 8.2 per cent of its population. In January, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had chaired a<br />
meeting approving the Bill. If passed, Scheduled Tribes will have access to and ownership of minor forest<br />
produce, rights of grazing and access to traditional seasonal resources. Besides, they will have the right to<br />
self-cultivation. All of the above, cautions the Bill, can be exercised for 'bonafide' livelihood needs, though<br />
how this will be ascertained and policed remains questionable. The rationale being offered is that the Bill<br />
will 'correct the historical injustice.' It argues that forest rights on ancestral lands and habitat were not<br />
recognised when lands were consolidated under forest areas during the colonial period as well as in<br />
independent India. The proposed Act will override the Forest Conservation Act (FCA), 1980<br />
and the Wildlife Protection Act (WPA), 1972 — measures that were initiated and piloted by then Prime<br />
Minister, Indira Gandhi. The powers of policing will vest with Gram Sabhas, making the Forest Department<br />
redundant. "The <strong>Indian</strong> Forest Service might as weE pack up," says a highly-placed source in the Ministry<br />
of Environment and Forests (MoEF). (Pioneer 24/4/05)<br />
Tribals all set to gain rights over forests (6)<br />
New Delhi: It could well become the ' Magna Carta for forest dwelling tribals. Cleared by the law ministry<br />
late on Tuesday night after months of turf war between the ministries of environment and forest and tribal<br />
affairs, the Scheduled Tribes (Recognition of Forest Rights) Bill lives up to the initial promise of<br />
resuscitating the manki munda raj (rule of tribal chiefs). Proclaiming correction of "historical injustice<br />
before it is too late to save our forests from becoming the abode of undesirable elements", the Bill at one<br />
stroke seeks to return to the tribals their traditional rights on a host of issues which have been at the heart<br />
of the conservation debate. It proposes 12 specific rights — "heritable but not alienable or transferable" —<br />
to tribals of forest villages. These include: Right to hold and live in the forest land under the individual or<br />
common occupation for habitation or for self-cultivation for livelihood , Right of access, use or disposal of<br />
minor forest produce<br />
Rights of entitlement such as grazing and traditional seasonal resource access of nomadic or pastoralist<br />
communities, Rights in or over disputed lands under any nomenclature in any state where claims are<br />
disputed * Rights for conversion of pattas or leases or grants issued by any local authority or any state<br />
government on forest lands to titles * Rights of settlement of old habitations and unsurveyed villages,<br />
whether notified or not, Right to protect, regenerate or conserve or manage any community forest<br />
resource which they have been traditionally protecting and conserving. (Times of India 28/4/05)<br />
May – <strong>2005</strong><br />
"Tribal Rights Bill could lead to societal division" (6)<br />
NEW DELHI: The Scheduled Tribes (Recognition of Forest Rights) Bill, <strong>2005</strong> has drawn criticism from<br />
various quarters. <strong>Social</strong> groups and environmentalists believe that the Bill, if implemented in the present