27.01.2015 Views

JUSTIFIED - Monergism Books

JUSTIFIED - Monergism Books

JUSTIFIED - Monergism Books

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTRODUCTION<br />

Getting Perspective<br />

RYAN GLOMSRUD<br />

Compared with the “Battle for the Bible,” sola fide has not loomed large as<br />

a topic of conversation in evangelical circles in the past. The formal cause<br />

of the Reformation, Scripture alone, captured evangelical attention from<br />

the 1950s more than the formal cause, justification by faith alone. And yet, one of<br />

the many flashpoints in evangelicalism in recent years has been between leading<br />

Baptist minister John Piper and Anglican Bishop N. T. Wright who are very<br />

much at odds, not on Scripture, but on the substance of biblical soteriology or the<br />

doctrine of salvation.<br />

Wright has produced several volumes of biblical-theological work at the lay<br />

and academic level, many of which are controversial in their own right; but the<br />

rising public dispute began with Piper’s The Future of Justification: A Response to N.<br />

T. Wright (Crossway, 2007) and continued with Wright’s rejoinder, an elaboration<br />

of key Pauline teachings in Justification: God’s Plan & Paul’s Vision (IVP, 2009). Neither<br />

book pulls any punches and in places the side discussion is harsh: for Piper,<br />

biblical orthodoxy is at stake, and Wright returns fire by comparing critics such<br />

as Piper to flat-earthers, even Pharisees. 1<br />

Ironically, Wright and others are critical of overly “introspective” Protestants<br />

for having cast themselves in the role of “Paul” and the medieval church doctors<br />

as “Pharisees” at the time of the Reformation; yet Wright now has little trouble<br />

placing himself in the apostle’s shoes against his “old perspective” agitators.<br />

“Someone in my position,” he writes, “is bound to have a certain fellow-feeling<br />

with Paul in Galatia. He is, after all, under attack from his own right wing.” 2<br />

Within broader evangelicalism, however, the fever-pitch at which this debate is<br />

sometimes argued is not, one suspects, because of either Piper’s or Wright’s intense<br />

argumentation and escalating rhetoric, but because the topic is keenly felt<br />

to have been at issue well before the clash of these two evangelical leaders. In<br />

other words, the justification debate in evangelicalism actually goes back much<br />

earlier than the arrival of the New Perspective on Paul.<br />

The five “solas” of the Reformation were at one time the consensus of Protestantism.<br />

Converging in the doctrine of justification, we are saved by grace alone<br />

(sola gratia) through faith alone (sola fide) because of Christ alone (solus Christus)<br />

all for God’s glory alone (soli Deo Gloria), a message of good news that is revealed<br />

to us in Scripture alone (sola scriptura). Over the past number of years, unfortunately,<br />

evangelicals have been divided on these otherwise unifying truths, tending<br />

to associate what was once the lifeblood of the evangelical movement with<br />

merely “getting saved.” While some evangelicals, including many teachers and<br />

high-profile pastors, have directly attacked the old Protestant consensus, undermining<br />

specifically the doctrine of justification, other rank-and-file believers have<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!