Work Plan in Detail - IKS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Success Indicators Interactive Knowledge is a unique attempt to achieve impact through industrial uptake of semantic web technologies in an important sector of the European economy: supporting business related semantic content and knowledge management. We describe the following five critical success factors and give success and failure conditions: • CSF-1 IKS Technology Stack • CSF-2 Interaction with knowledge at the user level • CSF-3 Raising the technological capabilities of CMS providers • CSF-4 Raising the value of interactive knowledge in the perception of the user • CSF-5 Providing a useful methodology for developing and managing semantic CMS CSF-1 IKS Technology Stack There are three sub-criteria that need to be achieved: • Specifications - it would be a success if IKS contributed significantly to standards of OASIS and W3C. It would be a failure if there were no specifications beyond to- Objectives Tree day's state of the art, after the project has ended. • Software - it would be a success if several non-trivial applications were developed and if these applications exhibit a widely acknowledged, significant integration of semantic models with current CMS technology. It would be a failure if more than half the developers would report the IKS framework to be unusable for their purposes. • Demo Applications - it would be a resounding success if 80% of IKS based applications received favourable reviews from their respective end users. It would be a failure if no significant applications have been built by month 36. CSF-2 Interaction with knowledge at the user level There are five sub-criteria that need to be achieved: 8
• Development of the Intelligent Project Controlling Tool as an early use case - it would be a success if the majority of end users regarded the tool as "helpful", "intelligent" and if the tool itself was proof of the IKS specifications. It would be a failure if the majority of the users do not see any difference to similar tools or achieves its success without use in any of the IKS specifications. • Useful interaction at applications level - it would be a success if the majority of applications were able to use the IKS interaction model for building their semantic CMS applications. It would be a failure if none of the applications make use of the generic model specification. • Useful basic knowledge models for use in applications - it would be a success if the majority of applications were able to use the IKS knowledge model for building their semantic CMS applications. It would be a failure if neither the models can be used directly or can be mapped to domain knowledge models. • IKS user model is adopted by many semantic CMS providers - it would be a success if the majority of applications were able to use the IKS user model for building their semantic CMS applications. It would be a failure if the model is neither used nor has defined relations to existing popular user models. • IKS Discourse Model is used by many semantic CMS providers - it would be a success if the majority of applications were able to use 9 Success Indicators the IKS discourse model for building their semantic CMS applications. It would be a failure if the IKS discourse models are not accepted by relevant communities as an innovative and useful approach. CSF-3 Raising the technological capabilities of CMS providers There are four sub-criteria that need to be achieved: • Horizontal use case applications - it would be a success if CMS providers which previously had a strong specialisation for a specific sector, would report significant new business opportunities in new application domains, afforded by the increased capabilities of the IKS framework. It would be a failure if none of the CMS providers report efficiency gains. • Vertical use case applications - the success criteria for vertical integration are dependent on the actual structure of the IKS Stack. The semantic benchmarks in WP1 will lead to our first set of success criteria. The final set will be decided together with the release version of the IKS framework, in M36. It would be a failure if neither the methodology nor the IKS software framework would lead to tangible industrial uptake. • 40+ CMS firms are participating in IKS - it would be a success if the target of 50 CMS providers taking part in validation experiments, was achieved. It would be a failure if less than 20 CMS providers were taking part by month 36. • Benchmarks for semantic capability - it would be a resounding success if the IKS benchmarks
Page 1 and 2: Interactive Knowledge Stack for sma
Page 3 and 4: Main Concepts aoreet nec interdum B
Page 5 and 6: • There have been three waves of
Page 7: IKS developed a working hypothesis
Page 11 and 12: Implementation Plan aoreet nec inte
Page 13 and 14: WP2 serves the purpose of providing
Page 15 and 16: chronisation" between traditional d
Page 17 and 18: WP 7 - Methodology for developing I
Page 19 and 20: This viewpoint requires to place co
Page 21 and 22: 21 Work Plan in Detail Each of the
Page 23 and 24: By Trenz Pruca Malesuada quis, eges

Work Plan in Detail - IKS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?