Connectionism and LOT

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Characterizing local representations: • Individual nodes are symbols, <strong>and</strong> can be components of a language of thought. • Not typical of connectionist networks. • One neuron per symbol does not seem biologically plausible. Cell assemblies have thus been proposed for neuro-symbols: http://publik.tuwien.ac.at/files/PubDat_166316.pdf
2) Distributed representations. E.g.: Cat Tiger Leopard Lion See also: David L. Anderson. Computer Types: Classical vs. Non-classical http://www.mind.ilstu.edu/curriculum/nature_of_computers/computer_types.php (cf. SmartKitchen: http://smartkitchen.ict.tuwien.ac.at/project/project.html)
Page 1 and 2: Connectionism & Connectionism and L
Page 3: Types of Connectionist Representati
Page 7 and 8: 3) No representation. More controve
Page 9 and 10: LOTH approach: I am thirsty. There
Page 11 and 12: Connectionism makes eliminativism p
Page 13 and 14: Advantages of Connectionism 1) Biol
Page 15 and 16: 3) Performance of connectionist net
Page 17 and 18: 4) Connectionism provides a natural
Page 19 and 20: 1) Biological plausibility Networks
Page 21 and 22: 2) The 100 step argument Problem: w
Page 23 and 24: Another weakness of Connectionism S
Page 25 and 26: 1) Connectionism implements LOT Con
Page 27 and 28: 3) Hybrid theory Some mental proces
Page 29 and 30: Rule composing the implement and ha
Page 31 and 32: Connectionism and Modularity Connec

Connectionism and LOT

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?