28.01.2015 Views

PSG 2012 Hawaii abstracts - Pacific Seabird Group

PSG 2012 Hawaii abstracts - Pacific Seabird Group

PSG 2012 Hawaii abstracts - Pacific Seabird Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Naomi A. Bargmann *1, 2 , Veronica M. Padula 1 , and Douglas Causey 1, 2 , 1 nbargmann@gmail.com,<br />

Department of Biological Sciences, U Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Drive, Anchorage, AK<br />

99508, 2 Environmental and Natural Resources Institute, U Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Drive,<br />

Anchorage, AK 99508<br />

Stable isotope analyses are often used to infer migration patterns, diet composition and trophic status of<br />

seabirds. Many techniques are used to analyze stable isotopes among and within tissues, which potentially<br />

affect the results, their interpretation and thus the comparability of studies. One such difference is seen<br />

with the processing of lipids in samples. Tissues contain variable amounts of lipids that are depleted in<br />

the heavy carbon isotope ( 13 C) and may introduce a bias in these values. There is evidence that lipid<br />

extraction may affect other stable isotope ratios, such as δ 15 N. Consequently, correction factors need to be<br />

applied to appropriately interpret δ 13 C and δ 15 N values for individual species and tissue type. In this study,<br />

we collected seven species of seabirds from the Near Islands, the western most group of islands in the<br />

Aleutian Island archipelago. We sampled kidney, liver, heart and muscle samples from each bird and after<br />

freeze drying, individual tissue samples were divided into two subsamples. We left one subsample<br />

unaltered and extracted lipids from the other subsample using a 2:1 chloroform-methanol solution. We<br />

found that δ 13 C values varied among species and tissue type by as much as 1 %, while δ 15 N values<br />

remained fairly robust. Ultimately, the correction factors calculated for these seven seabird species will<br />

contribute to the growing body of knowledge regarding the effects of lipids on stable isotope ratios.<br />

NIGHT BIRDS RETURNING: A COLLABORATIVE EFFORT TO RESTORE SEABIRD NESTING<br />

HABITAT IN GWAII HAANAS NATIONAL PARK RESERVE AND HAIDA HERITAGE SITE<br />

Carita Bergman 1 , Jennifer Boyce 2 , Chris Gill 3 , Christine Gruman 4 , LukeHalpin 4 , Gregg Howald 5 , Laurie<br />

Wein* 1 , 1 Gwaii Haanas National Park Reserve and Haida Heritage Site, Box 37, Queen Charlotte, BC<br />

V0T 1S0, CANADA, Carita.Bergman@pc.gc.ca; 2 NOAA Restoration Center, Long Beach, CA; 3 Coastal<br />

Conservation, Tappen, BC; 4 School of Resource & Environmental Management, Simon Fraser<br />

University, BC; 5 Island Conservation, Vancouver, BC<br />

Gwaii Haanas National Park Reserve and Haida Heritage Site, cooperatively managed by the Haida<br />

Nation and the Government of Canada (Parks Canada), has identified introduced species as the primary<br />

threat to ecological integrity of the park reserve. Management of invasive species, including invasive rats,<br />

is an agency priority. In 2009, in an effort to restore 10 seabird nesting islands (~800 ha), a 5-year, 2-<br />

phase project to eradicate two species of rats was initiated. Islands were selected based on their historic<br />

seabird nesting values, with an objective to restore nesting habitat for Ancient Murrelets (translated as<br />

“night birds” from the Haida language, Synthliboramphus antiquus, a COSEWIC listed species) and two<br />

species of storm-petrels (Oceanodroma furcata and O. Leucorhoa). This project comprises three<br />

components: pre- and post- eradication monitoring (of both key ecosystem indicators and impacts to nontarget<br />

species), Phase 1 eradication (~100 ha using bait stations), and Phase 2 eradication (750 ha using<br />

bait broadcast techniques). The project is a collaboration between Gwaii Haanas, Island Conservation,<br />

Coastal Conservation, Simon Fraser University, and the Luckenbach Council. We present here a summary<br />

of pre-eradication monitoring, and Phase 1 eradication, completed in 2011. Modified eradication<br />

techniques dramatically reduced non-target species risk while still achieving the desired result. We see<br />

great potential for expansion of such restoration work both across lands managed Parks Canada Agency,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!