Deep Borehole Disposal of Nuclear Waste: Report from a Sandia ...
Deep Borehole Disposal of Nuclear Waste: Report from a Sandia ...
Deep Borehole Disposal of Nuclear Waste: Report from a Sandia ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Introduction<br />
On October 26, 2011 <strong>Sandia</strong> National Laboratories brought together twenty<br />
representatives <strong>from</strong> the fields <strong>of</strong> radioactive waste disposal and drilling to:<br />
review the state <strong>of</strong> deep borehole science and engineering; identify the<br />
necessary features <strong>of</strong> a deep borehole pilot demonstration; and consider<br />
organizational approaches to implementing a deep borehole pilot. Andrew<br />
Orrell (<strong>Sandia</strong>) presented an overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>Deep</strong> <strong>Borehole</strong> <strong>Disposal</strong> with a<br />
discussion <strong>of</strong> the vision and model for creating an industry/lab/academia<br />
consortium to pursue a demonstration, followed by a discussion <strong>of</strong> borehole<br />
pilot testing at the Climax stock in Nevada in the early 1980’s (Brady – <strong>Sandia</strong>),<br />
then a description <strong>of</strong> a recently issued base case reference borehole design<br />
(Arnold, Brady et al. 2011) <strong>from</strong> Bill Arnold (<strong>Sandia</strong>). Mike Driscoll (MIT) and<br />
Fergus Gibb (Sheffield) outlined alternative designs and novel rock-welding and<br />
sealing approaches (The individual presentations can be found below). A<br />
summary <strong>of</strong> the meeting discussions follows.<br />
Discussion<br />
<strong>Deep</strong> borehole disposal is calculated to be as safe as traditional mined geologic<br />
repositories (Brady, Arnold et al. 2009) but more flexible, less expensive<br />
(Arnold, Brady et al. 2011), and more rapidly implemented. Minus<br />
transportation and licensing costs, borehole disposal is estimated to cost about<br />
$158/kg HM (Arnold, Brady et al. 2011), substantially less than the cost<br />
estimated for Yucca Mountain and possibly less than the current collected<br />
nuclear waste fund fee on a per kg basis.<br />
A significant science and engineering literature <strong>of</strong> deep borehole disposal has<br />
accumulated (see Table 1 and the presentations at the end <strong>of</strong> this report) and<br />
important features <strong>of</strong> the approach have been pilot-tested (Patrick 1986).<br />
Table 1. Partial listing <strong>of</strong> borehole technical articles<br />
Subject<br />
Article<br />
<strong>Borehole</strong> Engineering analysis<br />
(Juhlin and Sandstedt 1989; Juhlin and<br />
Sandstedt 1989; Nirex 2004; Beswick<br />
2008)<br />
<strong>Borehole</strong> geochemistry<br />
(Anderson 2004; Brady, Arnold et al.<br />
2009)<br />
Rock welding for borehole plugging (Gibb, Taylor et al. 2008)<br />
Heat flow<br />
(O’Brein, Cohen et al. 1979; Brady,<br />
Arnold et al. 2009)<br />
Cannister design (Hoag 2006)<br />
<strong>Borehole</strong> support matrices (Gibb, McTaggart et al. 2008)<br />
Site selection for disposal <strong>of</strong> Pu in<br />
(Heiken and al. 1996)<br />
boreholes