Tender Notice & Evaluation Criteria for RO Building October 2012

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Criteria This Section contains all the criteria that the employer shall use to evaluate bids and qualify Bidders. No other factors, methods, or criteria shall be used. The bidder shall provide all the information requested. 1.0 Pre-Qualification In addition to the evaluation criteria listed, the following pre-qualification shall first apply. Failure to pass any of the areas will mean that the tender will not be considered for assessment: 1.1 Eligibility 1.1.1 Conflict of Interest - If the bidder is found to be involved, Fail – If no, Pass 1.1.2 Bank Ineligibility - If the bidder is found to be ineligible, Fail - If no, Pass 1.1.3 Excluded as a matter of the Borrower’s Country law or official regulation or act of compliance with a U.N.’s Security Council decision – If bidder is excluded, Fail – If no, Pass 1.2 Historical Contract Non Performance 1.2.1 History of Non Performing Contracts – If bidder has a more than one (1) Non Performing Contract, Fail - If no, Pass. 1.2.2 Pending Litigation - If bidder has more than one (1) Pending Litigation with TCIG, Fail - If no, Pass. 1.3 Financial Situation 1.3.1 Historical Financial Performance 1.3.2 Average Annual Construction Turnover 1.3.3 Financial Resources The Bidder must demonstrate access to, or availability of, financial resources such as liquid assets, unencumbered real assets, lines of credit, and other financial means, other than any contractual advance to a value not below US$0.5 million, Pass - If no, Fail.
Evaluation Criteria 1.4 Programme of works Programme of works must be submitted with the bid. Program of works must be detailed (including sequence of activities and milestones) that will be used to manage the project. Failure to provide a detailed and realistic programme of works, Fail - Otherwise, Pass. 2.0 Evaluation This section will be completed only if or when a bidder successfully demonstrates that that they have passed all the requirements in the pre-qualification section as highlighted above in 1.0 Evaluation of adequacy of Technical Proposal compared with Requirements – The contractor is required to complete the contract within the specified time and with the relevant technical personnel. The evaluation will be based on the technical proposal. 2.1 Equipment The Bidder must demonstrate that it has the key equipment or has access to the key equipment through lease/rental agreement as listed hereafter: No. Equipment Type and Characteristics Minimum Number required 1 Backhoe/Excavator 1 No. 2 Crane 1 No. 3 Plate Compactor 2 No. 4 Poker Vibrators 1 No. The Bidder shall provide further details of proposed items or equipment to be used. - Min. of the 4 key equipment listed above 10 points - More than one but less than the 4 key equipment 1-5 points - Non of the 4 key equipment listed above 0 points 2.2 Method Statement Method Statement must be detailed highlighting how the works will be completed within the stipulated time. Failure to provide a detailed and realistic method statement will result in a score of 0 points - Method statement 0 or 5 point
Page 1: MINISTRY OF GOVERNMENT SUPPORT SERV
Page 5: Evaluation Criteria Tender No. 1 2

Tender Notice & Evaluation Criteria for RO Building October 2012

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?