29.01.2015 Views

Ibn Warraq - Why I Am Not a Muslim

Ibn Warraq - Why I Am Not a Muslim

Ibn Warraq - Why I Am Not a Muslim

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Koran 143<br />

disclaimers, there are at least four places in the Koran that <strong>Muslim</strong>s believe refer<br />

to miracles.<br />

1. The clefting of the moon: "The hour has approached, and the moon has<br />

been cleft. But if the unbelievers see a sign, they turn aside and say, 'Magic!<br />

that shall pass away!' " (sura 54.1, 2).<br />

2. The assistance given to the <strong>Muslim</strong>s at the battle of Badr: "When you<br />

said to the faithful: 'Is it not enough for you that your Lord helps you with<br />

three thousand angels sent down from high' No: if you are steadfast and fear<br />

God, and the enemy come upon you in hot pursuit, your Lord will help you<br />

with five thousand angels with their distinguishing marks" (3.120, 121).<br />

3. The night journey: "We declare the glory of Him who transports his servant<br />

by night from Masjidu 'l-Haram to the Masjiduf Aqsa [i.e., Mecca to Jerusalem]"<br />

(sura 17.1).<br />

4. The Koran itself, for <strong>Muslim</strong>s, remains the great miracle of Islam (sura<br />

29.48).<br />

The traditions are full of Muhammad's miracles, curing the ill, feeding a<br />

thousand people on one kid, etc.<br />

As our knowledge of nature has increased, there has been a corresponding<br />

decline in the belief in miracles. We are no longer prone to think that God intervenes<br />

arbitrarily in human affairs by suspending or altering the normal workings of<br />

the laws of nature. As our confidence in our discoveries of the laws of nature<br />

has increased, our belief in miracles has receded.<br />

David Hume argued in the following manner: 503<br />

A miracle is a violation of the laws of nature; and as a firm and unalterable<br />

experience has established these laws, the proof against a miracle, from the very<br />

nature of the fact, is as entire as any argument from experience can possibly<br />

be imagined. <strong>Why</strong> is it more than probable, that all men must die; that lead<br />

cannot, of itself, remain suspended in the air; . . . unless it be, that these events<br />

are found agreeable to the laws of nature, and there is required a violation of<br />

these laws, or in other words a miracle to prevent them <strong>Not</strong>hing is esteemed<br />

a miracle, if it ever happens in the common course of nature. . . . But it is a<br />

miracle, that a dead man should come to life; because that has never been observed<br />

in any age or country. There must, therefore, be a uniform experience against<br />

every miraculous event, otherwise the event would not merit that appellation.<br />

And as a uniform experience amounts to a proof, there is here a direct and<br />

full proof, from the nature of the fact, against the existence of any miracle; . . .<br />

The plain consequence is . . . "That no testimony is sufficient to establish<br />

a miracle, unless the testimony be of such a kind, that its falsehood would<br />

be more miraculous, than the fact, which it endeavours to establish."<br />

And in every putative miracle, it is more reasonable and in accordance with<br />

our experience to deny that the "miracle" ever happened. People are duped and<br />

deluded, are apt to exaggerate, and have this strong need to believe; or as Feuerbach<br />

put it, a miracle is "the sorcery of the imagination, which satisfies without

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!