30.01.2015 Views

Reservoir properties and petrophysical modelling of carbonate sand ...

Reservoir properties and petrophysical modelling of carbonate sand ...

Reservoir properties and petrophysical modelling of carbonate sand ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Geological Society, London, Special Publications published online June 27, 2012 as doi: 10.1144/SP370.6<br />

D. PALERMO ET AL.<br />

Fig. 12. Rock-columns from the central part <strong>of</strong> a major shoal body were derived for a 2.1× 1.1 m sized slab which was<br />

previously mapped for sedimentary structures. Permeability shows a patchy distribution but also a clear upward<br />

increasing trend in all four rock columns.<br />

facies types. The well-sorted pack <strong>and</strong> pack- to<br />

grainstones (A) <strong>of</strong> the bottom part have about<br />

10% porosity <strong>and</strong> low permeability, which can be<br />

explained by comparably high mud content, occluding<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> potential primary interparticle porespace.<br />

In contrast, the upper well-sorted grainstone<br />

sheet (C) has lower mud content <strong>and</strong> higher<br />

amounts <strong>of</strong> interparticle porosity, resulting in better<br />

porosity <strong>and</strong> permeability values. The poorly sorted<br />

bioclastic pack- to grainstones also show textural<br />

differences, but are additionally controlled by the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> biomodic porosity <strong>of</strong> leached shells.<br />

Generally, the porosities in the investigated poorly<br />

sorted pack- to grainstone beds (B, D) range<br />

between 11.3 <strong>and</strong> 18.2%. The moderate permeability<br />

in bed B ranges between 7.6 <strong>and</strong> 32.9 mD, while<br />

the average permeability in the upper bed (D)<br />

varies between 90.1 <strong>and</strong> 202.0 mD. Thus, lateral<br />

changes in porosity <strong>and</strong> permeability within an individual<br />

facies body remain in the same order <strong>of</strong><br />

magnitude within a similar stratigraphic position.<br />

These changes seem to correspond generally to the<br />

vertical textural changes that seem to follow the<br />

observed stratigraphic cycles. Moreover, also the<br />

lateral differences in porosity <strong>and</strong> permeability<br />

within the individual layers seem to be accompanied<br />

by slight lateral variations in the Dunham texture.<br />

The general occurrence <strong>of</strong> laterally continuous<br />

reservoir bodies is commonly controlled by<br />

medium-scale cycles, since porous units occur<br />

preferentially around their regressive maxima. In<br />

contrast, internal porosity <strong>and</strong> permeability variations<br />

are <strong>of</strong>ten controlled by small-scale cycles.<br />

The best reservoir <strong>properties</strong> are found around<br />

small-scale regressive maximum. This effect is<br />

most likely the result <strong>of</strong> stratigraphically controlled<br />

variations in mud content, <strong>and</strong> additional complex<br />

diagenetic overprints <strong>of</strong> cementation <strong>and</strong> selective<br />

leaching (see previous section).<br />

Regarding the entire flow unit, the lateral pattern<br />

<strong>of</strong> the permeable layers along the same stratigraphic<br />

cycles indicates that the observed centimetre-scale<br />

heterogeneities owing to sedimentary structures<br />

play a subordinate role.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!