LED adoption in general lighting applications

Recommendations

Info

Lighting Technology Comparison: Lamp life vs. technology LED System Incandescent Induction FL Linear FL CFL HID HPSodium HID Metal Halide 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 Hours
Light Source Efficacy over Time Comparison 100 50 Light source efficacy ( Lumen/Watt) 1904 1879 1938 // Fluorescent Incandescent 1950 1959 1961 Mercury vapor lamps Year of invention Metal halide lamps Halogen 1981 CFL 2000 1996 136 2002 OSRAM Opto Lab Demo 2008 2006 2012 White Power LED
Page 1 and 2: LED adoption in general lighting ap
Page 3 and 4: OSRAM SYLVANIA’s vision for LED l
Page 5 and 6: Key advantages of LED’s for gener
Page 7 and 8: What are we doing in LED lighting?
Page 9 and 10: Lighting Technology Comparison: Emi
Page 11: Lighting Technology Comparison: Lam
Page 15 and 16: OSRAM SYLVANIA Application macro-se
Page 17 and 18: Freezer Case Application Example Li
Page 19 and 20: Downlight Application Example Light
Page 21 and 22: A directional LED lightsource examp
Page 23 and 24: LED Standards • Several standards
Page 25 and 26: LED Standards Fact Sheet: LED Measu
Page 27 and 28: LED Standards Fact Sheet: LED Measu
Page 29 and 30: Barriers to adoption of LED technol
Page 31 and 32: Business models Lamp Manuf. Ballast
Page 33 and 34: General Illumination Application Se
Page 35 and 36: Decorative lighting applications: H
Page 41: Conclusion •LEDs have already sta

LED adoption in general lighting applications

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?