Descendants of John/Robert Noyes (1269) - Gulbangi.com
Descendants of John/Robert Noyes (1269) - Gulbangi.com
Descendants of John/Robert Noyes (1269) - Gulbangi.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
a jury <strong>of</strong> inquiry at Collingbourne Kingston on 20 April 37 Henry VIII [1546] with Thomas Corderoy and William Sotewell,<br />
both <strong>of</strong> Chute.<br />
Thomas <strong>Noyes</strong> was mentioned with his cousins, the children <strong>of</strong> his uncle <strong>Robert</strong> <strong>Noyes</strong>, in several suits concerning the<br />
entail <strong>of</strong> the manor <strong>of</strong> Littleton in the parish <strong>of</strong> Kimpton. In a suit before the Court <strong>of</strong> Requests, it was recorded that "Jone<br />
<strong>Noyes</strong>, widow [<strong>of</strong> <strong>Robert</strong>, Sr.], <strong>Robert</strong> <strong>Noyes</strong> [Jr.], Wyll[ia]m <strong>Noyes</strong>, <strong>John</strong> <strong>Noyes</strong> the brother <strong>of</strong> the said <strong>Robert</strong>, Nych[o]las<br />
<strong>Noyes</strong>, Thomas <strong>Noyes</strong>, Emma wife <strong>of</strong> the said <strong>Robert</strong>, <strong>John</strong> <strong>Noyes</strong> son <strong>of</strong> the said <strong>Robert</strong>, Jone <strong>Noyes</strong> and Anne <strong>Noyes</strong><br />
daughters <strong>of</strong> the said <strong>Robert</strong>" leased the manor <strong>of</strong> Lytleton with appurtenances from the Abbot <strong>of</strong> the Monastary <strong>of</strong> St.<br />
Peters <strong>of</strong> Gloucester. This transaction took place 4 April 15 Henry VIII [1524] and was for the term <strong>of</strong> 61 years. The record<br />
goes on to say that Thomas <strong>Noyes</strong> and all but the children <strong>of</strong> <strong>Robert</strong> were <strong>of</strong> majority. On 16 July 24 Henry VIII [1532],<br />
another deed was drawn up leasing the manor to "joan <strong>Noyes</strong> the widow, <strong>Robert</strong> <strong>Noyes</strong>, Emme, <strong>John</strong> <strong>Noyes</strong> the son, Jone<br />
the daughter and Anne <strong>Noyes</strong>, and Margery, Agnes, Mary, Ede and Cecely, daughters <strong>of</strong> <strong>Robert</strong> and Emme [born since<br />
the previous contract]," to hold for a period <strong>of</strong> 70 years so long as they should live. Nicholas St. <strong>John</strong> countered that Joan<br />
<strong>Noyes</strong>, widow, and <strong>Robert</strong> meant to defraud William, <strong>John</strong>, and Nicholas <strong>Noyes</strong>, "the brethren <strong>of</strong> <strong>Robert</strong>," and Thomas<br />
<strong>Noyes</strong>. Nicholas Seyntjohn had purchased the rights from various parties to the first lease. Nicholas <strong>Noyes</strong> and Thomas<br />
<strong>Noyes</strong> granted their interest to him at "Remrygge" [Ramridge], Hampshire. It was after purchasing those rights that<br />
Nicholas Seyntjohn attempted to enter the manor forcibly. The suit in question was apparently dated 22 June 6 Edward VI<br />
[1552]. <strong>Robert</strong> Annetts, <strong>of</strong> Vyfylde [Fifield], Hants., husbandman, aged 52, deposed that he knew <strong>Robert</strong> <strong>Noyes</strong>, "father <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Robert</strong> <strong>Noyes</strong>," who had taken a lease <strong>of</strong> the manor <strong>of</strong> Lytylton long before the above mentioned leases. He leased the<br />
manor as "<strong>Robert</strong> <strong>Noyes</strong> the father," with Jone his wife, Willm <strong>Noyes</strong>, <strong>John</strong> <strong>Noyes</strong>, Nicholas <strong>Noyes</strong>, Robarte <strong>Noyes</strong> now<br />
Complainant and to Thomas <strong>Noyes</strong> cousin <strong>of</strong> <strong>Robert</strong>e <strong>Noyes</strong> the father." This deposition proves the relationship <strong>of</strong><br />
Thomas <strong>Noyes</strong> to the others.<br />
At the time <strong>of</strong> the suit, the term "cousin" meant an uncle/nephew relationship as readily as it would mean cousin in the way<br />
we now interpret the term. Chronology forces the conclusion that Thomas must be the elder <strong>Robert</strong>'s nephew. If the<br />
relationship were further distant, it is very unlikely that Thomas would have been included in the entail <strong>of</strong> the manor with<br />
<strong>Robert</strong> and his children, or that he would be included after <strong>Robert</strong>'s death when his widow Jone renewed the lease. The<br />
most logical conclusion is that Thomas was the only surviving male issue <strong>of</strong> <strong>Robert</strong>'s deceased brother, and that <strong>Robert</strong><br />
had been protecting his nephew's interests as his guardian. <strong>Robert</strong>'s brother William and his family were already well<br />
provided for, so there was no reason to include them. Thomas was the male heir <strong>of</strong> the family.<br />
Thomas <strong>Noyes</strong> and his descendants acquired both the manor <strong>of</strong> Ramridge and the manor <strong>of</strong> Blissmore Hall in the parish<br />
<strong>of</strong> Weyhill (also known as Penton Grafton). The manors were important because it was on their grounds that the annual<br />
fair was held. Weyhill Fair, "one <strong>of</strong> the largest and most celebrated in England," was held for three days, from September<br />
28 through 30. It brought the "lord <strong>of</strong> the manor <strong>of</strong> Weyhill and others...substantial pr<strong>of</strong>its... In the great days <strong>of</strong> the fair<br />
140, 000 sheep were sometimes sold in a day... It drew folk from all parts <strong>of</strong> the country, insomuch that in 1665 it was<br />
deemed expedient to forbid its being held for fear <strong>of</strong> spreading the plague.<br />
The manors <strong>of</strong> Ramridge and Blissmore Hall appear in later records to be distinctly separate, but the Fair was held partly<br />
on Blissmore Hall Acre, partly on lands belonging to Ramridge, and partly on the parish glebe. Thomas <strong>Noyes</strong> was farmer<br />
<strong>of</strong> the manor <strong>of</strong> Ramridge by 1552/3, by which time his son <strong>Robert</strong> occupied Blissmore Hall. It was in that year that<br />
Thomas conveyed "goods, chattels and household stuff" to his grandson, <strong>John</strong>, son <strong>of</strong> <strong>Robert</strong>, who was then "about some<br />
dozen years <strong>of</strong> age." <strong>John</strong> made a deposition stating these facts on 31 May 42 Eliz. I [1600], and listing the specific goods<br />
that had been conveyed to him by his grandfather. Those goods were given to his father <strong>Robert</strong> and carried in a cart from<br />
Ramridge, where his grandfather Thomas was "then farmer," to Blissmore Hall, where <strong>John</strong>'s father <strong>Robert</strong> "then dwelt,"<br />
along with cattle Thomas had given both <strong>Robert</strong> and <strong>John</strong>. Thomas charged <strong>Robert</strong> that <strong>John</strong> should receive the goods at<br />
age twenty, but <strong>John</strong> had never received them (<strong>John</strong> stated that the goods, chattels and household stuff were worth £40).<br />
At <strong>Robert</strong>s death, <strong>John</strong> "did fully and absolutely give" his right in these things to Peter <strong>Noyes</strong>, his son. Peter discharged<br />
and acquitted his uncle, William <strong>Noyes</strong>, <strong>John</strong>'s brother, who was <strong>Robert</strong>'s sole executor, in consideration where<strong>of</strong> William<br />
conveyed the remainder <strong>of</strong> his estate in Blissmore Hall to Peter after William's death. Peter was also to give William's two<br />
daughters 24 marks when he received the farm.<br />
Alexander Bolton, as Master <strong>of</strong> the Almhouse or Hospital <strong>of</strong> Ewelme, Oxford, brought suit against Thomas <strong>Noyes</strong>' son<br />
<strong>Robert</strong>, trying to regain control <strong>of</strong> the manor <strong>of</strong> Ramridge and Weyhill Fair. Master Bolton claimed "the manor <strong>of</strong> Ramryge<br />
otherwise called Weyhill" to be theirs, including "one parcel <strong>of</strong> ground containing one acre in Weyhill together with the<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>of</strong> one certain fair there kept yearly by the space <strong>of</strong> three days, that is to say, the day <strong>of</strong> the feast <strong>of</strong> St. Michael the<br />
Archangel, the day before and the day after the same feast." He claimed they had been seised <strong>of</strong> it until 8 Henry VIII<br />
[1517/18], when <strong>John</strong> Rogers <strong>of</strong> Bryanston, Dorset, Esquire, fought for right <strong>of</strong> the manor with the Master <strong>of</strong> the Almhouse<br />
at that time. Master Bolton claimed they won the dispute, but had to admit that "one <strong>Robert</strong> <strong>Noyes</strong> claiming and pretending<br />
__________________________________________________________________________<br />
Page 4