02.02.2015 Views

Brownian motion and harnack inequality for ... - Math.caltech.edu

Brownian motion and harnack inequality for ... - Math.caltech.edu

Brownian motion and harnack inequality for ... - Math.caltech.edu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

230 M. AIZENMAN AND 8. SIMON<br />

Combined with (3.20) this r<strong>edu</strong>ces the problem to showing that<br />

<strong>for</strong> h L 0. Since 4 is bounded from above, we only need to show that<br />

Using the duality (3.18) again, we see that this is equivalent to<br />

which is (1.23).<br />

XEW<br />

The following is in many ways the first of the two main results of this paper<br />

(v = 1,2 can be accommodated by using the remark after Proposition 3.6):<br />

THEOREM 3.8. Let v 2 3, V E K,‘”. Then <strong>for</strong> any xo, there are balls C Q<br />

about xo (depending onb on local norms of V) such that, <strong>for</strong> f E L’(aQ; du),<br />

Proof: Let A be a closed union of spheres about xo with @ n A = 0, A C Q<br />

(see Figure 1). Let S, be a sphere about xo contained in A <strong>and</strong> let Qr be the ball<br />

whose boundary is S,. By the strong Markov property of <strong>Brownian</strong> <strong>motion</strong>, <strong>for</strong><br />

x E Q’,<br />

(Mb’i)(x) = (M3)P)<br />

Figure I. A reference <strong>for</strong> the proof of Theorem 3.8.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!