03.02.2015 Views

#665 NLR-NIFSAB 2003-03_v3 - Northern Illinois Fire Sprinkler ...

#665 NLR-NIFSAB 2003-03_v3 - Northern Illinois Fire Sprinkler ...

#665 NLR-NIFSAB 2003-03_v3 - Northern Illinois Fire Sprinkler ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RETROs e c t i o n<br />

Insurance Giant Allstate Takes<br />

Protection Advice<br />

Allstate, one of the largest insurance protectors<br />

in the United States, is protecting itself<br />

against fire.<br />

The Company recently completed a 10-year<br />

long retrofit program at its two million<br />

square foot campus in Northbrook, IL.<br />

Bernie Arends, President of the <strong>Illinois</strong> <strong>Fire</strong><br />

Inspectors Association and <strong>Fire</strong> Prevention<br />

Director with the Glenview <strong>Fire</strong> Department,<br />

said Allstate phased in sprinklers during the<br />

decade to coincide with new construction<br />

and remodeling of its established buildings.<br />

He estimated the retrofit cost at about $25<br />

million over the time period.<br />

Those improvement costs included not<br />

only the sprinkler systems, but also installation<br />

of a fire hydrant loop around the complex<br />

with two feeds to each building and an<br />

electric fire pump on generated power and a<br />

diesel backup fire pump.<br />

In addition, Allstate standardized all emergency<br />

exit signs, synchronized all fire horns<br />

and strobes, installed standpipes in stairwells<br />

and upgraded elevators with smoke detectors<br />

and call back features.<br />

When the 12-story buildings were first constructed,<br />

the Allstate campus was located in<br />

unincorporated Cook County during a period<br />

when commercial fire sprinklers were not<br />

mandated. Even at the time of incorporation<br />

into the municipality, an ordinance existed<br />

that exempted businesses with campuses in<br />

excess of 60 acres, leaving Allstate to decide<br />

on its own to provide sprinkler protection for<br />

its employees and buildings.<br />

Arends explained the reason for the<br />

decade-long timeframe that it took for the<br />

complete retrofit.<br />

"The cost was one factor that they wanted<br />

to amortize over a longer period of time," he<br />

said. "And because of the disruption to their<br />

employees and facilities, they took sections of<br />

buildings that were due for renovation and<br />

incorporated the sprinklers in those areas. A<br />

lot of sprinkler retrofitting was done in conjunction<br />

with interior remodeling and reconfiguration<br />

of their office spaces."<br />

"The driving force was the total life safety<br />

upgrade to include the major portion of fire<br />

sprinklers," Arends added. "They didn't just<br />

throw pipe in ceilings … they went way<br />

beyond that for fire safety."<br />

"They voluntarily decided to retrofit every<br />

single property because of the number of<br />

people there and the risk," Arends concluded.<br />

"We presented Allstate with the <strong>Illinois</strong> <strong>Fire</strong><br />

Inspectors <strong>Fire</strong> Safety Achievement Award for<br />

outstanding corporate achievement in fire<br />

prevention and safety directly related to this<br />

project … and because of their corporate<br />

responsibility."<br />

December 2005<br />

Why Pass this Law<br />

by Tom Lia, <strong>NIFSAB</strong> Executive Director.<br />

<strong>Fire</strong> <strong>Sprinkler</strong> Times<br />

On August 19,2005, the State of <strong>Illinois</strong> Legislature<br />

passed SB46. The law calls for a stairway<br />

door re-entry system in reaction to the fire at<br />

69 West Washington in Chicago.It was a noble<br />

gesture,but toally unnecessary since the State<br />

<strong>Fire</strong> Marshal adopted Life Safety Code 101 2000<br />

Edition that calls for this requirement for buildings<br />

of four stories or more.<br />

Exceptation 1. Not less that 2 levels where it is<br />

possible to leave the stairway enclosed.<br />

Exceptation 2. Not more than 4 stories intervening<br />

between levels where re-entry is allowed.<br />

Exceptation 3. Re-entry must be permitted on<br />

the top or next to the top story that allows<br />

access to another exit.<br />

Exceptation 4. Doors allowing re-entry must be<br />

identified as such on the stairway side of the door.<br />

Exceptation 5. Doors not allowing re-entry<br />

must be identified as such on the stairway<br />

side of the door.<br />

Exceptation 6. Stair enclosures serving a building<br />

permitted to have a single exit or can lock<br />

all of the doors if there is an automatic release.<br />

In addition, there was no need to pass a<br />

high-rise ordinance in Chicago. Only a<br />

timetable was needed to be assigned as<br />

again the Life Safety Code 101 2000 Edition<br />

applies to Chicago’s existing buildings. (See<br />

James Lee Witt Report) Requiring the commercial<br />

building to retrofit was appropriate<br />

with a reasonable 12 year planned deadline.<br />

But, it does not require residential high-rises<br />

to retrofit and it allows residential high-rise<br />

building owners and managers to pass a<br />

watered down “Life Safety Evaluation.”That<br />

will result in future injuries, deaths and major<br />

property damage. Why compromise when<br />

you have a statewide model code in place<br />

This Life Safety Evaluation is also unnecessary<br />

because the State <strong>Fire</strong> Marshal Life Safety Code<br />

has an existing building evaluation procedure.<br />

This is one issue that Chicago’s Law Office<br />

division, State’s Attorney Lisa Madigan, and<br />

the law firm of Robert Clifford and Associates<br />

should prepare for now so there are no surprises<br />

after the next high-rise tragedy.<br />

Chicago High-Rise retrofit deadlines:<br />

April 1, 2005: Life Safety Data Sheet due.<br />

Questions include: (1) Is your building a highrise;<br />

(2) Does the building have sprinklers; (3)<br />

Contact information and more.<br />

September 1, 2005: Commercial building<br />

compliance plan for fire sprinklers must be submitted<br />

to the Chicago <strong>Fire</strong> Prevention Bureau<br />

January 1, 2006: The Life Safety Evaluation<br />

(LSE) Report or the Life Safety Compliance<br />

Plan must be submitted to the Chicago <strong>Fire</strong><br />

Prevention Bureau.<br />

Toll-Free: 866-2<strong>NIFSAB</strong> (866-264-3722) • www.firesprinklerassoc.org 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!