08.02.2015 Views

COUNCIL MEM - Watertown, NY

COUNCIL MEM - Watertown, NY

COUNCIL MEM - Watertown, NY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mayor Graham reminded Council that they can not dictate the use if the use is consistent with<br />

the zoning classification of the property. He stated that hours and asking if they use a hammer is<br />

not something for site plan discussion.<br />

Council Member Butler responded that Council is just trying to be proactive and trying to work<br />

with both parties.<br />

Council Member Clough remarked that he disagreed with Mayor Graham. He stated that<br />

listening to what potential owners are saying is important to decide how to vote.<br />

Attorney Slye advised that when Council sits as a planning board, which is now the case, they<br />

don’t have the right to vote against a site plan because they think it bothers the neighbors. That<br />

can be challenged in an Article 78 court proceedings for being arbitrary and capricious. He stated<br />

that Mayor Graham was absolutely correct. This property must be looked at as zoned.<br />

Council Member Butler asked Attorney Slye what influence the Council had in this process.<br />

Attorney Slye advised that Council could consider adequate drainage, traffic, building size and<br />

adequate set backs. He stated that whether a business is open on Sunday is not a Council<br />

decision. He advised that in the case of Red and White Auto, it was a special use permit because<br />

that business was in a Neighborhood Business zone. However, that can’t be used in commercial<br />

zones.<br />

Mayor Graham remarked that he had spoken with the neighbors and they didn’t have a big<br />

problem with this.<br />

Council Member Butler asked if any of the adjourning property owners wanted to speak.<br />

Michael Ryan, Smith Street, spoke on behalf of his parents who live on Casey Street, right next<br />

to this property. He explained that their concerns had been addressed. He stated that his parents<br />

have lived there for 59 years and at that time, the area was residential. Now it has changed to<br />

commercial. He also remarked that he felt the questions posed by Council were legitimate<br />

questions. He explained that their concerns were addressed at the Planning Board.<br />

Jean Ryan, Casey Street and owner of the property next to the proposed car lot, addressed the<br />

chair stating that when Burger King moved in years ago, they broke their fence and ruined their<br />

swimming pool and the Ryan’s were not aware of site plans or the Planning Board. Mrs. Ryan<br />

stated that Mr. Vecchio then pulled up their plants and they still were not aware of site plans or<br />

the Planning Board. She explained that Mr. Sharlow had spoken with her and told her it would<br />

be just a small building. Then, she found out it was going to be a big cement building. She stated<br />

that she felt let down that a commercial property could come in and the residents have to fight.<br />

She stated that she thought this was a sales and service business. She didn’t know that it would<br />

be opened seven days a week and would be a repair garage.<br />

INTRODUCED BY <strong>COUNCIL</strong> <strong>MEM</strong>BER ROXANNE M. BURNS<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!