14.11.2012 Views

A Case Study of Mary Jane Sims Elementary - Department of ...

A Case Study of Mary Jane Sims Elementary - Department of ...

A Case Study of Mary Jane Sims Elementary - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

instruction and being dedicated, the staff at <strong>Sims</strong> provide all students opportunities for success.<br />

“[The teachers] do everything it takes to make sure each and every one gets educated.” This<br />

“everything it takes” attitude includes small-group instruction, after-school tutoring, and afterschool<br />

programs to provide every student with the best chance to receive an education. The <strong>Sims</strong><br />

philosophy <strong>of</strong> learning includes, “All <strong>of</strong> you can learn, you’re going to learn, it’s not an option.”<br />

Another teacher asserted, “We have a no-excuse mentality.” It is evident that the community<br />

prioritizes reflective practices to ensure student learning. Consequently, their reflective nature<br />

acknowledges areas <strong>of</strong> programmatic improvements.<br />

When teachers were asked how special populations were served at <strong>Sims</strong>, a majority <strong>of</strong> the<br />

respondents agreed students were appropriately served in bilingual and special education<br />

programs; however, a key area <strong>of</strong> programmatic improvement was the Gifted and Talented (GT)<br />

Program. Respondents said, “unfortunately, our GT [students] are not getting special services,”<br />

and “we don’t have enough GT [identified students] and we know that.” Most respondents stated<br />

the GT population was underserved and that it was something they wanted to improve; 2 stated<br />

they were unaware <strong>of</strong> a GT program. According to the 2006-2007AEIS data, the <strong>Sims</strong> GT<br />

program does not have the student GT representation compared to other schools in the district,<br />

the district, or state (Figure 4). Another concern was the high retention rate at second grade<br />

(Figures 5 and 6) and teachers’ comments about lack <strong>of</strong> instructional support in the lower grades.<br />

Percentage<br />

8.0%<br />

7.0%<br />

6.0%<br />

5.0%<br />

4.0%<br />

3.0%<br />

2.0%<br />

1.0%<br />

0.0%<br />

<strong>Sims</strong><br />

<strong>Elementary</strong><br />

Campus<br />

Group<br />

District State<br />

Figure 4. Gifted and Talented (GT) Program enrollment 2006-2007.<br />

Page 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!