23.02.2015 Views

Order Granting Preliminary Injunction - Forest Service Employees for ...

Order Granting Preliminary Injunction - Forest Service Employees for ...

Order Granting Preliminary Injunction - Forest Service Employees for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case 3:05-cv-02220-SI Document 27 Filed 06/27/2005 Page 10 of 10<br />

1<br />

case.<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

On balance, the Court finds that plaintiffs have demonstrated irreparable harm if the Court does not<br />

grant the motion <strong>for</strong> a preliminary injunction, based on the environmental value of the trees subject to logging<br />

and the irreversible nature of logging. Additionally, defendant’s only harm is economic, which has been found<br />

to be of significantly less importance than environmental harm when courts determine irreparable harm. Finally,<br />

the Court is skeptical that logging must begin immediately, as claimed by defendant, when the Sims Project<br />

Decision requires two of the eight units to begin logging operations after August 31.<br />

8<br />

United States District Court<br />

For the Northern District of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

For the <strong>for</strong>egoing reasons and <strong>for</strong> good cause shown, the Court hereby GRANTS plaintiffs’ motion<br />

<strong>for</strong> preliminary injunction. There<strong>for</strong>e, the Court ORDERS that defendant, its agents, officers and employees<br />

are preliminarily enjoined from awarding the contract <strong>for</strong> the Sims Fire Salvage Project, harvesting any trees<br />

pursuant to the May 17, 2005 Decision Memo or undertaking any further action until this case can be heard<br />

and decided on the merits. The Court finds that plaintiffs do not need to post a bond in this case.<br />

The Court will schedule dispositive motions at the earliest convenient date suggested by the parties, so<br />

as to assure a prompt decision on the merits.<br />

IT IS SO ORDERED.<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

Dated: June 27, 2005 S/Susan Illston<br />

SUSAN ILLSTON<br />

United States District Judge<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!