24.02.2015 Views

Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing v. Earthlink - IP Spotlight

Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing v. Earthlink - IP Spotlight

Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing v. Earthlink - IP Spotlight

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

number to determine said individual caller’s credit.” The recited function of the<br />

“acknowledgment number structure” is “providing a computer generated acknowledgement<br />

number to said individual callers.”<br />

Without any analysis, EarthLink argues that the specification discloses a general purpose<br />

computer to perform these functions. If EarthLink is correct, under WMS Gaming, the disclosed<br />

structure must include both the general purpose computer and algorithms disclosed by the<br />

specification. Id. at 1349.<br />

<strong>Katz</strong> disagrees and argues that the ‘762 patent specification discloses special purpose<br />

components to perform the recited functions. With respect to the credit verification structure,<br />

<strong>Katz</strong> identifies the interface 20, processors PR1-PRN, which have qualification unit 93, buffer 97<br />

and memory 98 as performing the recited function. In support of that contention, <strong>Katz</strong>’s expert,<br />

Dr. Brody, identifies a passage that describes the qualification unit 93 performing a two stage<br />

test under control of the processing unit 92. (Brody Decl. at 384 (citing to ‘762 patent at 11:17-<br />

35).) The test verifies the customer number and credit card information. This passage shows that<br />

qualification unit 93 corresponds to the recited function of the claimed “credit verification<br />

structure.” Dr. Brody also states that processing unit 92, buffer 97 and memory 98 should be<br />

included as corresponding structures, but does not explain the basis for these additions. (Brody<br />

Decl. at 380.) For the purposes of this motion, this Court does not need to determine if these<br />

structures also correspond to the recited function. This Court only needs to determine whether<br />

this means plus function limitation falls within WMS Gaming. It does not because the<br />

qualification unit 93 performs the recited function.<br />

With respect to the acknowledgment structure, <strong>Katz</strong> identifies five different combinations<br />

of structures that perform the recited function:<br />

(a) one or more of processors PR1-PRn;<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!