11.03.2015 Views

Review Editor Guidelines - Frontiers

Review Editor Guidelines - Frontiers

Review Editor Guidelines - Frontiers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Checklist<br />

Article Acceptance/Rejection<br />

If the <strong>Review</strong> <strong>Editor</strong>s are satisfied with the authors’ efforts at amending the manuscript, they<br />

then briefly finalize their Interactive <strong>Review</strong> Reports, which automatically notifies the Associate<br />

<strong>Editor</strong> of article acceptance. The Associate <strong>Editor</strong> accepts the final version of the manuscript<br />

within five days, and this action does not require the approval of the Specialty Chief <strong>Editor</strong>.<br />

Once a manuscript is accepted, the authors receive an automated notification informing them of<br />

the acceptance and the provisional PDF will instantly appear online. <strong>Review</strong> <strong>Editor</strong>s are invited<br />

to publish a one-page joint commentary to be linked to the published article, however this is not<br />

mandatory. Payment of the publication fee is required within thirty days of acceptance and<br />

necessary before final publication of the manuscript.<br />

Articles can only be rejected by the Chief <strong>Editor</strong>, while the Associate <strong>Editor</strong> who handles an<br />

article can only recommend rejecting an article. The Chief <strong>Editor</strong> may override an Associate<br />

<strong>Editor</strong>’s recommendation to reject the article and insist to call in further <strong>Review</strong> <strong>Editor</strong>s to<br />

continue the review process.<br />

The Assignment of Associate and <strong>Review</strong> <strong>Editor</strong>s to a Manuscript<br />

A key philosophy at <strong>Frontiers</strong> is to constantly move responsibility for publishing scientific papers<br />

down rather than up the chain. It would be a big step for publishing if we could increase the<br />

integrity of the peer-review system! At the same time, we have a huge responsibility to authors<br />

when their valuable work is submitted. Unnecessary time delays are not acceptable.<br />

In all editing/review invitations, the Associate/<strong>Review</strong> <strong>Editor</strong>s are requested to confirm that they<br />

don’t have any conflicts of interest. Moreover, to further guarantee the transparency of the<br />

review, the names of the Associate and <strong>Review</strong> <strong>Editor</strong>s involved are disclosed on all published<br />

articles, without exceptions.<br />

The assignment of <strong>Review</strong> and Associate <strong>Editor</strong>s to the review of a manuscript is composed of<br />

the following steps:<br />

1. During submission, the authors indicate an Associate <strong>Editor</strong> whom they trust to be both<br />

knowledgeable and unbiased for editing their manuscript.<br />

2. The authors may list up to three <strong>Review</strong> <strong>Editor</strong>s who might have a conflict of interest to<br />

be excluded from the review process.<br />

3. The Associate <strong>Editor</strong> selected by the authors is asked to edit the manuscript. If the<br />

Associate <strong>Editor</strong> does not accept this invitation within two days, the journal’s entire<br />

Associate Board is invited.<br />

4. The first Associate <strong>Editor</strong> to respond is assigned to edit the manuscript.<br />

5. The Associate <strong>Editor</strong> has seven days to assign two <strong>Review</strong> <strong>Editor</strong>s.*<br />

6. If two <strong>Review</strong> <strong>Editor</strong>s have not accepted after a seven-day delay, the journal’s entire<br />

<strong>Review</strong> Board is invited. Those <strong>Review</strong> <strong>Editor</strong>s excluded by the authors are excluded<br />

from this invitation.<br />

7. The Associate and Chief <strong>Editor</strong>s can, at any time, invite additional <strong>Review</strong> <strong>Editor</strong>s<br />

and/or revoke those who have accepted as deemed necessary.<br />

The general guidelines for inviting Associate and <strong>Review</strong> <strong>Editor</strong>s to join the boards invoke the<br />

recruitment of top ranking researchers in terms of number of papers published and citation<br />

www.frontiersin.org 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!