An Ecosystem Management Strategy for Sierran Mixed-Conifer Forests
An Ecosystem Management Strategy for Sierran Mixed-Conifer Forests
An Ecosystem Management Strategy for Sierran Mixed-Conifer Forests
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PSW-GTR-220<br />
Eric Knapp<br />
Figure 9—Landscape variation in burn intensity on the Moonlight Fire (2007), Plumas National Forest.<br />
We suggest creating<br />
landscape heterogeneity<br />
in the Sierra<br />
Nevada by mimicking<br />
the <strong>for</strong>est conditions<br />
that would be created<br />
by the fire behavior<br />
and return interval<br />
associated with<br />
differences in slope<br />
position, aspect, and<br />
slope steepness.<br />
We suggest creating landscape heterogeneity in the Sierra Nevada by mimicking<br />
the <strong>for</strong>est conditions that would be created by the fire behavior and return<br />
interval associated with differences in slope position, aspect, and slope steepness<br />
(Sherlock 2007). In general, stem density and canopy cover would be highest in<br />
drainages and riparian areas, and then decrease over the midslope and become lowest<br />
near and on ridgetops (fig. 10). Stem density and canopy cover in all three areas<br />
would be higher on northeast aspects compared to southwest. Stand density would<br />
also vary with slope becoming more open as slopes steepen.<br />
20