17.03.2015 Views

SEC Complaint: WG Trading Investors, L.P., et al. - FINRA - Rules ...

SEC Complaint: WG Trading Investors, L.P., et al. - FINRA - Rules ...

SEC Complaint: WG Trading Investors, L.P., et al. - FINRA - Rules ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

notes in order to keep a record of the hundreds of millions of dollars that Greenwood and W<strong>al</strong>sh<br />

were taking from the <strong>WG</strong>TI account. Greenwood and W<strong>al</strong>sh typic<strong>al</strong>ly signed the notes in March<br />

or later in the year.<br />

36. In tot<strong>al</strong>, Greenwood and W<strong>al</strong>sh signed promissory notes in which they<br />

“promised” to repay <strong>WG</strong>TI $554 million. Greenwood’s notes tot<strong>al</strong>ed $293 million and W<strong>al</strong>sh’s<br />

notes tot<strong>al</strong>ed $261 million. All of the notes were signed and dated January or March for the<br />

years 1996 and 1998 through 2008. The notes purported to reflect the “gener<strong>al</strong> partner’s share of<br />

losses, withdraw<strong>al</strong>s and payments” during the previous year. The notes do not reflect that any<br />

interest is payable on the princip<strong>al</strong>, nor do they bear any terms and conditions one would expect<br />

to find in a bona fide promissory note.<br />

Money Transfers to the Relief Defendants<br />

37. During the course of their fraudulent scheme, Greenwood and W<strong>al</strong>sh <strong>al</strong>so<br />

instructed the Employee to transfer investor money from the <strong>WG</strong>TI account to Relief Defendants<br />

R. Greenwood and J. W<strong>al</strong>sh.<br />

38. From June 20, 2007 to December 15, 2008, Greenwood caused the Employee to<br />

make at least 19 wire transfers tot<strong>al</strong>ing at least $47,500 from the <strong>WG</strong>TI account to an account<br />

owned by his wife, R. Greenwood.<br />

39. From July 6, 2007 to January 9, 2009, W<strong>al</strong>sh caused the Employee to make at<br />

least 4 wire transfers tot<strong>al</strong>ing at least $2 million from the <strong>WG</strong>TI account to an account owned by<br />

his ex-wife, J. W<strong>al</strong>sh.<br />

40. Accordingly, the Relief Defendants have directly received proceeds derived from<br />

the Defendants misconduct, and these proceeds constitute ill-gotten gains that must be disgorged.<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!