Defining Corporate Social Responsibility - Tutorsindia
Defining Corporate Social Responsibility - Tutorsindia
Defining Corporate Social Responsibility - Tutorsindia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Responsibility</strong><br />
<strong>Corporate</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Responsibility</strong> and Leadership<br />
10.5 Motivation<br />
We can see that leadership is to a large extent concerned with dealing with people in order to<br />
optimise the results achieved. Indeed all managerial action is concerned with dealing with people.<br />
This has been expressed by McGregor in the following terms:<br />
“Every managerial decision has behavioural consequences. Successful management<br />
depends upon the ability to predict and control human behaviour”<br />
McGregor also classified people according to two types , which he labelled as Theory X and<br />
Theory Y. According to him Theory X described the fact that people dislike work and can only<br />
be persuaded to work by coercion. His Theory Y on the other hand described the fact that people<br />
are conscientious and self motivated. As far as organisations are concerned they are often<br />
managed on the assumption that Theory Y applies to managers and senior professionals, who car<br />
motivated and can be trusted to perform effectively, while Theory X applies to other workers<br />
who need to be controlled and coerced through sanctions. The ideas of good leadership which we<br />
have discussed however show this to be problematic. What we should be aiming for as part of<br />
good leadership is to motivate people. There are a variety of different theories of motivation<br />
however which all suggest different thing about what motivates people.<br />
Please click the advert<br />
Download free ebooks at bookboon.com<br />
121