23.03.2015 Views

download - SPGS

download - SPGS

download - SPGS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HeartWood<br />

No. 6 (2010)<br />

12 PAGES OF SCIENCE, REVIEWS AND OPINIONS<br />

PROTECTIVE CLOTHING –<br />

THE LAST LINE OF DEFENCE<br />

by Walter Mapanda, <strong>SPGS</strong> Plantations’ Technical Advisor<br />

Use of Personal Protective Clothing b) Protective equipment such as safety<br />

(PPE) makes hazards at the work goggles and respirators (Health Working<br />

place more manageable. Provisions Lives, 2010).<br />

of PPE coupled with PPE training Forestry has consistently been one of the<br />

programmes enhance employees feelings<br />

about the level of safety and security<br />

within their work environment which in<br />

turn improves the organisation’s business<br />

most hazardous industries in the world. For<br />

example, in 2008 the United States logging<br />

industry employed 86 000 workers of which<br />

93 died as a result of accidents associated<br />

performance. PPE provision and training with forestry operations. This resulted in<br />

programmes improve productivity by a fatality rate of 108.1 deaths per 100 000<br />

minimizing worker and process downtime<br />

(Reliable Plant, 2010). Small investment in<br />

PPE and PPE training serves the employers<br />

a lot of money by offsetting costs resulting<br />

workers which is more than 30 times higher<br />

than the overall fatality rate in workplaces<br />

of 3.5 deaths per 100 000 in the US in 2008<br />

(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,<br />

from injuries, chronic health problems and 2010). British Columbia Forest Safety<br />

potential workplace fatalities.<br />

Unfortunately, however, in Uganda there are<br />

few employers who provide their employees<br />

Council (2010) compiled five year fatalities<br />

statistics for harvesting operations shown in<br />

Table 1 below.<br />

Table 1. Fatalities in Harvesting in British Columbia 2006-2010<br />

HARVESTING OPERATION<br />

YEAR<br />

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010<br />

Log Hauling 5 1 3 0 2<br />

Yarding / Mechanised Harvesting 2 4 0 1 0<br />

Travelling to and from work 0 3 3 0 0<br />

Manual Tree Felling 0 1 8 2 0<br />

Other 4 2 2 1 0<br />

Direct Fatalities Total 11 11 16 4 2<br />

Source: British Columbia Safety Council (August 2010)<br />

IN THIS ISSUE:<br />

• Investment Opportunities<br />

for Tree Growers in Uganda<br />

• Training Needs Report<br />

• New Tree Species for Trials<br />

in Uganda<br />

• Lots of Interesting Reviews<br />

with PPE. Most of those that provide PPE<br />

do so without linking it to other measures<br />

which protect workers from health and safety<br />

hazards. This article defines PPE, explains<br />

the importance of PPE and the relationship<br />

of PPE to other health and safety protection<br />

measures.<br />

PPE is all equipment (including clothing<br />

affording protection against the weather)<br />

which is intended to be worn or held by a<br />

person at work which protects them against<br />

one or more risks to their health and safety.<br />

PPE includes:<br />

a) Protective clothing such as safety shoes,<br />

hard hats, overalls, gloves, high visibility<br />

waistcoats and clothing which protects<br />

against the weather.<br />

From the above results it is clear that most<br />

fatalities occured in log hauling and manual<br />

tree felling section. Workers compensation<br />

premiums are affected by injury frequency as<br />

well as severity. Therefore, the more injuries<br />

a company has, the higher is its premiums.<br />

PPE and PPE training reduces injury frequency<br />

and severity (Benjamin, 2010).<br />

An injury that could occur in a forestry<br />

organization would consist of “direct”<br />

and “indirect” costs. Direct costs include<br />

ambulance services, emergency room care,<br />

examination by a doctor, medication,<br />

hospitalization and temporary disability<br />

benefits. Indirect costs are normally<br />

approximated to be three or four times the<br />

direct cost.<br />

Walter at the <strong>SPGS</strong> Clients’ Meet, July, 2010<br />

Indirect costs include the following:<br />

• Cost of lost time of the injured employee.<br />

• Cost of lost time of the employees who<br />

stopped work to attend to the injured.<br />

• Cost of lost time to conduct an<br />

investigation.<br />

• Cost of training a new employee to fill in<br />

for the injured employee.<br />

• Cost of training the injured employee to<br />

perform a new job while recovering.<br />

• Cost due to damage to machinery, tools,<br />

and other property.<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!