25.03.2015 Views

The Third Wave: Future Trends in International Education - CEMI

The Third Wave: Future Trends in International Education - CEMI

The Third Wave: Future Trends in International Education - CEMI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Centre for Entrepreneurial Management and Innovation<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Wave</strong>: <strong>Future</strong> <strong>Trends</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

5<br />

Larger organisations, with significant ownership advantages, have favoured sole or jo<strong>in</strong>t venture entry modes.<br />

Smaller organisations, that usually lack resources, have preferred direct export<strong>in</strong>g or jo<strong>in</strong>t venture entry<br />

modes, usually driven by a desire to reduce costs and risk. When there are high contractual risks, organisations<br />

with well-differentiated products are likely to prefer <strong>in</strong>vestment to export<strong>in</strong>g. However, when <strong>in</strong>vestment risk<br />

is high, export modes are preferred (Agarwal and Ramaswami 1992). <strong>The</strong> foreign market entry strategy<br />

decision requires an evaluation of four critical variables (risk, return, cost, and control) (Rugman and Verbeke<br />

1992; Hill and Kim 1988; Goodnow 1985; Anderson and Coughlan 1987). This evaluation has been termed<br />

transaction cost analysis and it suggests that a firm will <strong>in</strong>ternalise activities it can perform at lower cost and<br />

will outsource activities when other providers have an advantage (Anderson and Weitz 1986).<br />

THE INTERNATIONALISATION OF EDUCATION SERVICES<br />

Erramilli (1990) suggested that there were ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ services and that this dist<strong>in</strong>ction was important <strong>in</strong><br />

the development of market<strong>in</strong>g operations. Hard service providers can separate the production and<br />

consumption of their service (e.g. architecture), while soft service providers cannot (e.g. education). ‘Hard’<br />

services can be exported directly but ‘soft’ services need some form of forward <strong>in</strong>tegration if an enterprise is<br />

to establish an <strong>in</strong>ternational presence. Erramilli and Rao (1990; 1990) suggested services exporters can be<br />

divided <strong>in</strong>to ‘client follow<strong>in</strong>g’ and ‘market seek<strong>in</strong>g’ firms. <strong>The</strong> first group exported because clients moved<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternationally and they were obliged to follow. <strong>The</strong> second group actively sought foreign market<br />

opportunities. On this basis, education can be classified as a ‘soft’ service and most <strong>in</strong>stitutions engaged <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational markets are ‘market seek<strong>in</strong>g’ organisations.<br />

Cowell (1984) identified six foreign market entry strategies for service enterprises (direct export, licens<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

franchis<strong>in</strong>g, jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures, acquisition and management contract<strong>in</strong>g). Direct export can <strong>in</strong>volve a service<br />

enterprise send<strong>in</strong>g representatives abroad. However, <strong>in</strong> the case of education direct export has been a ‘first<br />

wave’ approach, with students travell<strong>in</strong>g from source to host countries. Licens<strong>in</strong>g, franchis<strong>in</strong>g, jo<strong>in</strong>t ventures<br />

and management contract<strong>in</strong>g strategies require an <strong>in</strong>stitution to move offshore or forward <strong>in</strong>to its export<br />

channels, usually with an <strong>in</strong>ternational alliance partner or as a coalition member. This is also often the case for<br />

acquisition strategies that, by foreign government regulation, usually require local coalition partners. “Forward<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegration” (mov<strong>in</strong>g offshore <strong>in</strong>to an export channel) is a logical second stage (after direct export) <strong>in</strong> the<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternationalisation of education service providers. It can also offer considerable competitive advantage to<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions that embrace such strategies (Soutar and Mazzarol 1995).<br />

In <strong>in</strong>ternational markets, ‘spatial pre-emption’ can be obta<strong>in</strong>ed through an appropriate foreign market entry<br />

strategy and, <strong>in</strong> turn, through the channel structure adopted. Because production and consumption are<br />

difficult to separate <strong>in</strong> services, the location of service delivery outlets is of critical importance (Allen 1988). For<br />

this reason, the ‘pre-emption’ of strategic locations can be a source of competitive advantage with<strong>in</strong> a service<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry (Bharadwaj, Varadarajan and Fahy 1993).<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Terpstra (1987: 333) market entry is “one of the most critical decisions <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g” as it sets the framework for channel structure and the level of control a firm will have over its<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g channel (Stern and El-Ansary 1982). Anderson and Coughlan (1987) noted that an <strong>in</strong>tegrated (i.e.<br />

jo<strong>in</strong>t venture) or an <strong>in</strong>dependent channel structure may be suitable. Determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g which approach to take is a<br />

complex task, <strong>in</strong>fluenced by such factors as the level of <strong>in</strong>tangibility with<strong>in</strong> the service component and the age<br />

of the product category.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>separability of service production and consumption <strong>in</strong>creases the need for service exporters to <strong>in</strong>tegrate<br />

forward <strong>in</strong>to their market<strong>in</strong>g channel and establish ‘foreign manufactur<strong>in</strong>g facilities’ (Nicouland 1989).<br />

Because ‘soft’ services, such as education, <strong>in</strong>volve a high degree of ‘consumer and producer <strong>in</strong>teraction’<br />

Centre for Entrepreneurial Management and Innovation | www.cemi.com.au

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!