Compton Way, Earls Barton - Political Developments Limited - PDL
Compton Way, Earls Barton - Political Developments Limited - PDL
Compton Way, Earls Barton - Political Developments Limited - PDL
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Compton</strong> <strong>Way</strong>, <strong>Earls</strong> <strong>Barton</strong><br />
STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT<br />
APPENDIX E: EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE<br />
We live at 73 <strong>Compton</strong> <strong>Way</strong> and have received your newsletter with proposals. We would like to raise the following points.<br />
You state that a transport assessment has concluded that there will be no significant impact on the area. On the<br />
contrary, Thorpe Road exits onto Station Road which is already double parked, heavily congested & the only<br />
route up to the centre of the village. There are ongoing concerns and Council reviews of parking and congestion<br />
in this area. Your development would prospectively add 130 cars trying to access this road at peak times (if we<br />
assume each home has 2 cars- which is the case for all existing houses in <strong>Compton</strong> <strong>Way</strong>).<br />
You talk of extensive open space in your development; however this appears to be a narrow green channel<br />
continuing along from an existing footpath, which the Parish Council last month agreed to close down, to protect<br />
homes in Shoemakers Close and <strong>Compton</strong> <strong>Way</strong> from burglary.<br />
We are personally concerned with the 8 houses you propose to pack in to a very small space at the top of your<br />
development. 6 of these houses fall along our boundary line with no space in between them. Instead of an open<br />
field we would be faced with a wall of houses which appear very close to our fence line in places. If the front of<br />
the terrace is in line with our neighbours back fence at no.69, then those houses must have tiny back gardens<br />
and loom large at the back of no.71. Can you state the proposed distance from our boundary line of these<br />
properties? If this proposal goes ahead in this form, we would share fences with 6 separate neighbours. Whose<br />
responsibility would maintenance be? Would you build substantial fences at the back of each property when you<br />
develop the site? At the moment we have open planting to enjoy the view and cannot pay to fence the boundary<br />
line.<br />
We appreciate your comments about drainage issues being dealt with, however our practical experience over the<br />
last 12+ years has been that, whenever there is heavy rain, that field becomes a bog. Should you build a wall of<br />
houses, with tiny gardens behind our property there are likely to be drainage issues both for our garden and the<br />
new homes.<br />
If this application is going ahead, we strongly suggest that you significantly reduce the number of houses<br />
proposed on this site to allow more space between properties and build slightly further away from existing<br />
homes.<br />
Mr & Mrs J Bromilow<br />
Sir<br />
I live at no 53 <strong>Compton</strong> <strong>Way</strong>. I appreciate the details of the proposed development. I would like to make the following<br />
comments:<br />
1) Although I realise there is a need for further housing in the county and that extra houses in <strong>Earls</strong> <strong>Barton</strong> may help to<br />
support the local shops I would be interested to know if the doctors, dentists and schools are able to support the extra<br />
need.<br />
2) Station Road, the only access to this site, is already a difficult thoroughfare. there is usually only single lane traffic due to<br />
the parked cars. putting a potential 100 plus extra cars along this stretch of road will increase the difficulty and is likely to<br />
cause considerable problems. This stretch of the road must already be difficult for the emergency services. with extra<br />
housing comes extra likely hood of need for these services and therefore more difficulty for all who live locally.<br />
3) <strong>Compton</strong> <strong>Way</strong> is already a minor race track for youths on motorcycles since they are able to exit via the current<br />
pedestrian and cycle access to Station road at the north end of the road. only yesterday I saw three small children on cycles<br />
almost run down by a speeding motorcyclist. an additional loop with access marked '2' on your plan is likely to increase<br />
this disturbance<br />
thank you<br />
Mrs Liz Waine<br />
| 18 Page