1O257LF
1O257LF
1O257LF
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
© 2010 Dinosauria International Ten Sleep Report Series No. 1<br />
orbits and nasal openings in the skull is well suited to allow<br />
the elongated snout to be submerged in water or mud for<br />
extended periods. Moreover, the right angle position of the<br />
occipital condyle against the long axis of the skull is another<br />
unique diplodocid synapomorphy that would allow the<br />
skull to be held in an inverted position while feeding. The<br />
inverted position of the head would make the intake of<br />
water easier, while at the same time permitting the rejection<br />
of water through the nasal openings to be blown away from<br />
the face (Fig 27). Therefore, nasal repositioning together with<br />
a flexed angle of the skull is consistent with the presence of<br />
a rostral organ for a rake and scoop mode of filter feeding,<br />
unlike the superfine filter feeding capabilities seen in baleen<br />
whales or flamingos.<br />
Cervical Vertebrae<br />
The remarkable architectural design of sauropod<br />
vertebrae, particularly the cervicals, has received great<br />
attention in recent years (Martin et al 1998, Wedel and<br />
Sanders 1999, Wedel 2003, Tsuihiji 2004, Stevens and Parrish<br />
2005, Schwarz et al 2007, Taylor et al 2009, and many others)<br />
which has added important information on the functional<br />
morphology.<br />
As a primary function, the long sauropod neck<br />
was designed for the obvious purpose of obtaining a better<br />
reach. With respect to feeding, such a reach had to take<br />
advantage of the resources available from one feeding zone<br />
into another, which would explain its extreme length. In the<br />
case of A. “brontodiplodocus”, reaching from a body of water<br />
onto a shoreline from a fixed location or into tall treetops<br />
seems to present the best logical explanation for natural<br />
selection to favor a long neck. To feed or to graze on plants<br />
at the feet, neck length need only be as long as the legs.<br />
So the notion that diplodocids like A. “brontodiplodocus”<br />
evolved long necks to keep their heads normally low for the<br />
purpose of grazing can be rejected and we therefore agree<br />
with the arguments by Taylor et al (2009) . Considering the<br />
unique feeding capabilities described above in “The Skull”,<br />
a practical function for an elongated neck may have been to<br />
wade at safe distances from land predators, hence a longer<br />
neck is not only energy efficient but would also insure a<br />
greater degree of survival. With the help of an elongated<br />
neck, Amphicoelias “brontodiplodocus” may have been able to<br />
reach from a deeper part of a lake or river to the shoreline<br />
where soft vegetation, algae, snails, clams and arthropods<br />
were abundant. In deeper water the pneumatic design of<br />
the axial skeleton may have had the advantage of keeping<br />
the body buoyant, while drifting or floating with little effort<br />
from one feeding area to another. In a study investigating the<br />
buoyancy and equilibrium in sauropods, Henderson (2003)<br />
determined that in water, the centre of mass located in the The Neural Spines<br />
hip area in diplodocids would allow the forequarters to float<br />
40<br />
at a higher level. This kind of buoyancy would also allow<br />
the individual to wade in deeper waters without incurring<br />
great pressure on the heart and lungs (Fig 34).<br />
From three Dana specimens that were found with<br />
articulated cervical vertebrae (DQ-BS, DQ-TY and DQ-SB),<br />
we can see that the morphology of the anterior vertebrae<br />
is designed for flexibility, enabling the head to look about<br />
independently. The best example being from DQ-TY death<br />
pose where the degree of flexion possible in the axial<br />
skeleton. For example, the ends of the centra are inclined,<br />
indicating that the neck was held naturally in a flexed<br />
position. The posterior cervical vertebrae, C 10-14, may have<br />
been held rigidly together, but the anterior ones, C 2-9, were<br />
flexible so that the head could move in various directions.<br />
In addition to looking about, they helped reach considerable<br />
distances up from the ground. Although the head and neck<br />
may have been held low while feeding, it had to be nearly<br />
straight up, much higher than the level of the hips, when<br />
walking. To avoid cantilever stress during walking, the head<br />
and neck probably had to be elevated and positioned back to<br />
a point where much of that weight could be balanced over<br />
its forelimbs.<br />
How the cervical vertebrae articulated below and<br />
not behind the braincase, is another important suite of<br />
evidence exemplified by the Dana specimens. The neck, in<br />
the position dictated by the occipital condyle, helps support<br />
the idea that it must have been flexible at least in its forward<br />
section in "goose neck" fashion. In our Dana specimens,<br />
flexibility was probably above the 9th cervical. Recent<br />
studies (Stevens and Parrish 2005) argue that the entire neck<br />
in diplodocids was kept stiff and held low to the ground.<br />
Our Dana specimens demonstrate, in part, the opposite<br />
condition, showing flexibility at the anterior set of neck<br />
bones. Part of the evidence is based on three Amphicoelias<br />
“brontodiplodocus” cervical series that were preserved with<br />
the anterior section loosely articulated while the back section<br />
was rigidly articulated. It makes sense for a head equipped<br />
with stereoscopic vision to have the added ability to look<br />
around, especially behind itself, to detect danger and to be<br />
able to use the whiplash tail effectively. Moreover, the cotyle<br />
joint in the centra are slanted giving the articular surface a<br />
greater area to pivot, thereby indicating that the vertebrae<br />
had the ability to flex in a great range of movement. With<br />
cervical flexibility, Amphicoelias “brontodiplodocus” could<br />
look about freely at the end of its long rigid neck, in the<br />
same manner as in the living ostrich. By contrast, in the<br />
living giraffe the atlas and axis act as the only pivot point of<br />
movement for the head’s ability to look about from the end<br />
of its long and rigid neck.