PDF FILE - Thompsons Solicitors
PDF FILE - Thompsons Solicitors
PDF FILE - Thompsons Solicitors
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
industrial action<br />
UNION FREEDOM BILL<br />
strike. The proposed Bill would<br />
extend those regulations by<br />
making it unlawful for<br />
employers to hire workers to<br />
break a strike.<br />
WILL SOLIDARITY<br />
ACTION NOT RESULT IN<br />
WILDCAT STRIKES?<br />
Whatever the Government<br />
says, the answer is no. The ILO<br />
particular customer (or supplier)<br />
dominates the employer’s trade<br />
to such an extent that it can<br />
interfere in the employer’s<br />
relations with their employees,<br />
injunctions to stop the<br />
industrial action. Employers<br />
know when there’s a dispute<br />
and a ballot in the offing. The<br />
Bill would scrap them.<br />
WHY ARE INJUNCTIONS<br />
SO EASY TO OBTAIN<br />
HERE?<br />
Both the ILO and the Council of<br />
Europe have condemned the<br />
ease with which the courts here<br />
says that sympathetic strikes<br />
should be lawful as long as the<br />
primary strike is lawful.<br />
The ILO has noted that<br />
sympathy strikes “are becoming<br />
increasingly frequent because of<br />
the move towards the<br />
perhaps by actions resulting in<br />
a pay cut.<br />
HOW CAN INDUSTRIAL<br />
ACTION BALLOTS BE<br />
SIMPLIFIED?<br />
International bodies also attack<br />
HOW CAN INDUSTRIAL<br />
ACTION NOTICES BE<br />
SIMPLIFIED?<br />
The Bill also says that all the<br />
onerous formalities for giving<br />
notice of industrial action<br />
grant interim injunctions to<br />
concentration of enterprises, the<br />
the UK’s industrial action<br />
should be replaced by an<br />
employers. The problem is that<br />
globalisation of the economy<br />
balloting rules for being overly<br />
obligation to give seven days<br />
the law says employers only<br />
and the delocalisation of work<br />
restrictive and complex.<br />
notice to employers of when the<br />
have to show that there is a<br />
centres.” And, it could have<br />
The Bill proposes a modest but<br />
industrial action will start, and<br />
“serious issue to be tried” later.<br />
added, contracting out and<br />
highly significant change in<br />
reasonable information about<br />
The Bill will change that so the<br />
privatisation.<br />
preventing legal action for trivial,<br />
those expected to take part.<br />
employer has to show they are<br />
more likely to win at trial than<br />
the union.<br />
The law also says that judges<br />
have to “weigh the balance of<br />
convenience”. Needless to say,<br />
the “balance” is heavily weighted<br />
in favour of employers who can<br />
argue that their business would<br />
be damaged if they don’t obtain<br />
the interim injunction.<br />
But, in the UK, all forms of<br />
solidarity action are unlawful.<br />
So the Bill proposes that a<br />
group of workers should have<br />
the freedom to take industrial<br />
action in support of another<br />
group who are on strike, but<br />
only in situations where there is<br />
a substantial connection<br />
between them.<br />
One situation would be where<br />
technical or accidental breaches<br />
of the balloting provisions, which<br />
could have no effect on the<br />
outcome of the ballot.<br />
In addition, the Bill proposes<br />
to remove the “bar” on<br />
industrial action where there<br />
has been a “prior call”,<br />
highlighted by the case of RMT<br />
-v- Midland Mainline in 2001.<br />
The union was told it could not<br />
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?<br />
Trade unionists and the<br />
politically active can help by<br />
sending motions to their union,<br />
political party branches and<br />
conferences. Ask your MP to<br />
sign up to an early day motion<br />
that supports the Bill.<br />
Watch out for the lobby of<br />
Parliament in the autumn<br />
The Bill does not address this<br />
the employer in the primary<br />
rectify a prior unofficial call to<br />
coinciding with the centenary<br />
specific issue, but does provide<br />
dispute and the employer<br />
take industrial action by<br />
of the Trade Disputes Act 1906.<br />
some limit on the operation of<br />
subject to solidarity action are<br />
repudiating the call and then<br />
Let’s send out the message that<br />
the “balance of convenience” by<br />
associated employers. A second<br />
conducting a proper ballot and<br />
we want our Government to<br />
denying employers an<br />
injunction if they don’t supply<br />
is where a second employer is<br />
covering the work of the strikers.<br />
serving the requisite notices.<br />
In reality, notices of ballots<br />
stop flouting international law<br />
and let’s demand our human<br />
specific information within a<br />
time frame.<br />
And the third is directed at the<br />
Gate Gourmet situation where a<br />
are of little value to employers<br />
except for obtaining court<br />
rights and freedoms for the<br />
21st century.<br />
THOMPSONS SOLICITORS Labour&European Law Review FEATURE 7