U.S. Senate Report: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed ... - NJIAT
U.S. Senate Report: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed ... - NJIAT
U.S. Senate Report: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed ... - NJIAT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
areas on the face of our planet have NOT yet been submerged by rising oceans... so<br />
probably low-lying areas along shorelines of Canada and the USA will be SAFE into<br />
foreseeable and even distant futures," Siitam wrote to EPW on September 22, 2007<br />
regarding an AP article predicting dire sea level rise. "By the way, I'd be happy to buy<br />
prized oceanfront properties at bargain prices, anywhere in the world, when unwarranted,<br />
panic selling begins. The dire predictions will not come true this century," he added.<br />
(LINK)<br />
Meteorologist Grant Dade Texas TV's KLTV, a member of both the American<br />
Meteorological Society and the National Weather Association, dismissed man-made<br />
climate fears in 2007. "I think it is about time we see the other side of the Global<br />
Warming debate come out," Dade said on November 8, 2007. "Is the Earth warming?<br />
Yes, I think it is. But is man causing that? No. It's a simple climate cycle our climate goes<br />
through over thousands of years." Dade critiqued the media for hyping climate fears<br />
while ignoring inconvenient facts. "Did you hear about the Arctic ice melting? But you<br />
didn't hear in Antarctica last winter was the most ice ever recorded," Dade said. "You<br />
don't hear that," he added. (LINK) & Click to watch video: (LINK)<br />
Dr. Art Robinson of the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine declared his<br />
climate skepticism in 2007. "Long-term temperature data suggest that the current -<br />
entirely natural and not man made - temperature rise of about 0.5 degrees C per century<br />
could continue for another 200 years. Therefore, the best data available leads to an<br />
extrapolated value of about 1 foot of rise during the next two centuries," Robinson wrote<br />
to EPW on September 23, 2007. "There is no scientific basis upon which to guess that the<br />
rise will be less or will be more than this value. Such a long extrapolation over two<br />
centuries is likely to be significantly in error - but it is the only extrapolation that can be<br />
made with current data. There may be no sea level rise at all. No one knows," he added.<br />
(LINK)<br />
Canadian Geologist Albert F. Jacobs, co-founder of the group Friends of Science,<br />
critiqued the Associated Press for hyping climate fears in 2007. "Basic to the IPCC case<br />
for sea level rise and for the alarmists' hype is the hypothesis that increasing levels of<br />
carbon dioxide will cause increasing amounts of global warming. It should be stressed<br />
that this assumption of truth is no more than a hypothesis, which is increasingly being<br />
attacked and on which any meaningful discussion has been thwarted by the IPCC's<br />
political masters," Jacobs wrote to EPW on September 23, 2007. "As far as CO2 is<br />
concerned, basic physics has always been clear about the limitations of higher<br />
concentrations of gas to absorb equivalent amounts of heat radiation. ‘Doubling of CO2'<br />
does none of the things the IPCC's computer says it does. And that's all separate from the<br />
fact that water vapour is a much greater ‘greenhouse' driver than carbon dioxide in any<br />
case," Jacobs added. (LINK)<br />
Meteorologist Chuck Wiese lambasted "fancy computer models that can be<br />
manipulated" and "are absolutely incorrect and fraudulent." Wiese called computer model<br />
predictions of climate doom a "bunch of baloney." "The physics of this is in support of<br />
anyone who is a skeptic. As I have said, C02 is of secondary importance; anything that<br />
we did to reduce C02 emissions is going to make no change in my opinion that you could<br />
really measure in the climate response at all, because other things are going on that just<br />
36