You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PROVEN DESIGN<br />
AND QUALITY FOR<br />
TOP PERFORMANCE<br />
ROSSFIRE<br />
I<br />
Heavy Duty,<br />
semi·alloyed<br />
steel frame.<br />
For full length<br />
resizing and<br />
bullet swaging.<br />
I nterchangeable<br />
Shell holders. Full<br />
3'12 inch stroke with<br />
favored downward leverage.............<br />
• Accuracy guaranteed to 1/10 grain.<br />
• Chrome plat~d easy to read beam.<br />
• Big 325 grain capacity.<br />
• Hand honed tool steel bearings.<br />
• Exclusive positive control, lock beam<br />
design for faster weighing.<br />
Shpg. wt. 4lbs.<br />
Chrome-plated, hardened,<br />
full length sizing and seating<br />
dies. Thread size %·14.<br />
Regular $13.50 value. For<br />
most rifle a nd pistol calibers.<br />
Shpg. wt. 2 Ibs.<br />
ORDER<br />
TODAY<br />
FREE!<br />
IMMEDIATE DELIVERY<br />
Send check or M. 0:· Shipping<br />
charges extra. ',4<br />
deposit on C.O.D.'s<br />
.. Beginners Guide to<br />
Handloading" tells<br />
what is needed, why<br />
it is needed and how<br />
it is done. Write today<br />
for your copy. No<br />
obligation.<br />
~.1. Wells, Inc.<br />
DEPT. 3E, HOWARD LAKE, MINN.<br />
Thanks, Charlie<br />
Congratulations on the two-fisted editorial<br />
on "swine under the guise of sportsmen," in<br />
the January issue. This is maybe the best you<br />
have ever writen, amigo.<br />
Charles Askins<br />
San Antonio, Texas<br />
Praise-and Otherwise<br />
You deserve high praise for the article in<br />
the December issue by William B. Edwards,<br />
exposing the wasteful destruction of guns by<br />
our Armed Forces. I wrote the two U. S.<br />
Senators and the Congressman from this dis·<br />
trict, urging them to investigate and take<br />
steps. I reminded them that "one old model<br />
gun in the hands of a citizen is worth 1,000<br />
new model guns which have not been manufactured<br />
or issued, in a case of national<br />
military disaster."<br />
But in the same issue Was an article which<br />
I do not think should ever have been published:<br />
"<strong>Guns</strong> For Survival," by Russell<br />
Tinsley. So much senseless, stupid "directions<br />
for procedure" and suggested methods for<br />
survival have been issued by the Civilian<br />
Defense Administration, and then withdrawn,<br />
that no one knows what might be best for<br />
individual families. This story proves only<br />
one thing-that Llano County, Texas, and the<br />
country around Mason. is a good hunting<br />
country. (It is; I have hunted and killed<br />
deer and wild turkey from there to Sonora.)<br />
But national survival does not contemplate<br />
the survival of one family here and there, but<br />
of immense groups of people. All the game in<br />
Llano County would not provide food for<br />
1000 families for very long!<br />
J. Maynard Peterson<br />
Chico, California<br />
Edwards' article on the destruction of guns<br />
has brought us a veritable flood of letters;<br />
far too many to print. Mr. Peterson's comments<br />
are typical.<br />
"<strong>Guns</strong> For Survival" brought a fair num·<br />
ber of letters also, some in praise, some<br />
voicing rather surprisingly bitter criti·cism.<br />
One labeled Tinsley "A gung-ho amateur ...<br />
(whose article was) dangerously misleading."<br />
But aren't we all "amateurs" in the sense<br />
that we lack experience of what to do in the<br />
event of such a situation? And wouldn't<br />
every man's problem be an individual one,<br />
depending on an infinite variety of circumstances?<br />
Neither writer nor editor suggested<br />
that a .22 rifle would solve every man's<br />
problem; if it helped even one, that would<br />
be something.-Editors.<br />
Our Faces Are Red •••<br />
Enjoyed your January issue, but must call<br />
attention to the error' on pages 38-39: the<br />
guns are Rugers, not<br />
C'est la vie.<br />
Ed Nolan<br />
Sturm, Ruger & Co.<br />
I wish to take this opportunity to do three<br />
things. First is to express my appreciation<br />
for such a fine magazine. Second is to point<br />
out, without criticizing, that the revolvers on<br />
pages 38-39 of the January issue, identified<br />
as Colt's, are in reality products of Sturm,<br />
Ruger & Co. Third is to back up my appreci.<br />
ation by extending my subscription for another<br />
year.<br />
James M. Young<br />
San Angelo, Texas<br />
Just finished reading my January issue and<br />
enjoyed it very much, as usual. I think you<br />
have done an exceptional job in tbe field of<br />
education and in spreading the word that a<br />
citizen who owns and uses firearms is not<br />
necessarily a hoodlum! Keep up the good<br />
work in fighting for our rights to keep firearms<br />
as part of our heritage.<br />
The picture and caption do ~ot agree in<br />
the article, "Birth of the Buscadero." Those<br />
are not Colt's but Rugers. I imagine that<br />
others will notice this also; but you cannot<br />
take such great strides forward without a few<br />
small mistakes. Again, keep up the good<br />
work.<br />
George E. Tice<br />
Cobleskill, N. Y.<br />
... but nobody ever had a nicer group of<br />
readers! Next time, we'll look at the picture<br />
before writing the caption. Even editors<br />
know the difference between the Ruger eagle<br />
(plainly visible) and the Rampant Colt!<br />
Editors.<br />
What Happened to<br />
Varmint Hunters?<br />
Approximately a year ago, several advertisements<br />
were run in GUNS concerning an<br />
organization called "Varmint Hunters Association,"<br />
Box 25, Centuck Station, Yonkers,<br />
New York. Recent letters to that address<br />
have gone unanswered. Has this organization<br />
gone out of existence? Any information<br />
would be most belpful.<br />
Keep up the good work with GUNS. As I<br />
go from town to town, I find tbat, more aud<br />
more, GUNS issues are' "sold out," while<br />
plenty of the other outdoor magazines remain<br />
on the stands. I am told everywhere<br />
that GUNS is a "best seller." It's the best!<br />
Blaine Kloppenborg<br />
Newton, Iowa<br />
Here's A Skeptic<br />
I don't know who printed the add on the<br />
back of the cover of your November issue,<br />
but it seems to me he is all wrong. The add<br />
describes the Ruger Convertible Single Six<br />
"a .22 cal. hand gun with dual personality.<br />
A quick change of cylinders converts the<br />
Single Six from regular to magnum."<br />
Now, being a gun bug and gun man for<br />
nearly 20 years, I claim you can't change a<br />
regular .22 to a mag..22 even with another<br />
10 GUNS • MARCH <strong>1962</strong>