01.05.2015 Views

March 1962 - Guns Magazine

March 1962 - Guns Magazine

March 1962 - Guns Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PROVEN DESIGN<br />

AND QUALITY FOR<br />

TOP PERFORMANCE<br />

ROSSFIRE<br />

I<br />

Heavy Duty,<br />

semi·alloyed<br />

steel frame.<br />

For full length<br />

resizing and<br />

bullet swaging.<br />

I nterchangeable<br />

Shell holders. Full<br />

3'12 inch stroke with<br />

favored downward leverage.............<br />

• Accuracy guaranteed to 1/10 grain.<br />

• Chrome plat~d easy to read beam.<br />

• Big 325 grain capacity.<br />

• Hand honed tool steel bearings.<br />

• Exclusive positive control, lock beam<br />

design for faster weighing.<br />

Shpg. wt. 4lbs.<br />

Chrome-plated, hardened,<br />

full length sizing and seating<br />

dies. Thread size %·14.<br />

Regular $13.50 value. For<br />

most rifle a nd pistol calibers.<br />

Shpg. wt. 2 Ibs.<br />

ORDER<br />

TODAY<br />

FREE!<br />

IMMEDIATE DELIVERY­<br />

Send check or M. 0:· Shipping<br />

charges extra. ',4<br />

deposit on C.O.D.'s<br />

.. Beginners Guide to<br />

Handloading" tells<br />

what is needed, why<br />

it is needed and how<br />

it is done. Write today<br />

for your copy. No<br />

obligation.<br />

~.1. Wells, Inc.<br />

DEPT. 3E, HOWARD LAKE, MINN.<br />

Thanks, Charlie<br />

Congratulations on the two-fisted editorial<br />

on "swine under the guise of sportsmen," in<br />

the January issue. This is maybe the best you<br />

have ever writen, amigo.<br />

Charles Askins<br />

San Antonio, Texas<br />

Praise-and Otherwise<br />

You deserve high praise for the article in<br />

the December issue by William B. Edwards,<br />

exposing the wasteful destruction of guns by<br />

our Armed Forces. I wrote the two U. S.<br />

Senators and the Congressman from this dis·<br />

trict, urging them to investigate and take<br />

steps. I reminded them that "one old model<br />

gun in the hands of a citizen is worth 1,000<br />

new model guns which have not been manufactured<br />

or issued, in a case of national<br />

military disaster."<br />

But in the same issue Was an article which<br />

I do not think should ever have been published:<br />

"<strong>Guns</strong> For Survival," by Russell<br />

Tinsley. So much senseless, stupid "directions<br />

for procedure" and suggested methods for<br />

survival have been issued by the Civilian<br />

Defense Administration, and then withdrawn,<br />

that no one knows what might be best for<br />

individual families. This story proves only<br />

one thing-that Llano County, Texas, and the<br />

country around Mason. is a good hunting<br />

country. (It is; I have hunted and killed<br />

deer and wild turkey from there to Sonora.)<br />

But national survival does not contemplate<br />

the survival of one family here and there, but<br />

of immense groups of people. All the game in<br />

Llano County would not provide food for<br />

1000 families for very long!<br />

J. Maynard Peterson<br />

Chico, California<br />

Edwards' article on the destruction of guns<br />

has brought us a veritable flood of letters;<br />

far too many to print. Mr. Peterson's comments<br />

are typical.<br />

"<strong>Guns</strong> For Survival" brought a fair num·<br />

ber of letters also, some in praise, some<br />

voicing rather surprisingly bitter criti·cism.<br />

One labeled Tinsley "A gung-ho amateur ...<br />

(whose article was) dangerously misleading."<br />

But aren't we all "amateurs" in the sense<br />

that we lack experience of what to do in the<br />

event of such a situation? And wouldn't<br />

every man's problem be an individual one,<br />

depending on an infinite variety of circumstances?<br />

Neither writer nor editor suggested<br />

that a .22 rifle would solve every man's<br />

problem; if it helped even one, that would<br />

be something.-Editors.<br />

Our Faces Are Red •••<br />

Enjoyed your January issue, but must call<br />

attention to the error' on pages 38-39: the<br />

guns are Rugers, not<br />

C'est la vie.<br />

Ed Nolan<br />

Sturm, Ruger & Co.<br />

I wish to take this opportunity to do three<br />

things. First is to express my appreciation<br />

for such a fine magazine. Second is to point<br />

out, without criticizing, that the revolvers on<br />

pages 38-39 of the January issue, identified<br />

as Colt's, are in reality products of Sturm,<br />

Ruger & Co. Third is to back up my appreci.<br />

ation by extending my subscription for another<br />

year.<br />

James M. Young<br />

San Angelo, Texas<br />

Just finished reading my January issue and<br />

enjoyed it very much, as usual. I think you<br />

have done an exceptional job in tbe field of<br />

education and in spreading the word that a<br />

citizen who owns and uses firearms is not<br />

necessarily a hoodlum! Keep up the good<br />

work in fighting for our rights to keep firearms<br />

as part of our heritage.<br />

The picture and caption do ~ot agree in<br />

the article, "Birth of the Buscadero." Those<br />

are not Colt's but Rugers. I imagine that<br />

others will notice this also; but you cannot<br />

take such great strides forward without a few<br />

small mistakes. Again, keep up the good<br />

work.<br />

George E. Tice<br />

Cobleskill, N. Y.<br />

... but nobody ever had a nicer group of<br />

readers! Next time, we'll look at the picture<br />

before writing the caption. Even editors<br />

know the difference between the Ruger eagle<br />

(plainly visible) and the Rampant Colt!­<br />

Editors.<br />

What Happened to<br />

Varmint Hunters?<br />

Approximately a year ago, several advertisements<br />

were run in GUNS concerning an<br />

organization called "Varmint Hunters Association,"<br />

Box 25, Centuck Station, Yonkers,<br />

New York. Recent letters to that address<br />

have gone unanswered. Has this organization<br />

gone out of existence? Any information<br />

would be most belpful.<br />

Keep up the good work with GUNS. As I<br />

go from town to town, I find tbat, more aud<br />

more, GUNS issues are' "sold out," while<br />

plenty of the other outdoor magazines remain<br />

on the stands. I am told everywhere<br />

that GUNS is a "best seller." It's the best!<br />

Blaine Kloppenborg<br />

Newton, Iowa<br />

Here's A Skeptic<br />

I don't know who printed the add on the<br />

back of the cover of your November issue,<br />

but it seems to me he is all wrong. The add<br />

describes the Ruger Convertible Single Six­<br />

"a .22 cal. hand gun with dual personality.<br />

A quick change of cylinders converts the<br />

Single Six from regular to magnum."<br />

Now, being a gun bug and gun man for<br />

nearly 20 years, I claim you can't change a<br />

regular .22 to a mag..22 even with another<br />

10 GUNS • MARCH <strong>1962</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!