05.05.2015 Views

Research Students' Annual Conference (RSAC) 2010 - School of ...

Research Students' Annual Conference (RSAC) 2010 - School of ...

Research Students' Annual Conference (RSAC) 2010 - School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Room 2 /<br />

St<br />

George<br />

Room1 / Great Woodhouse<br />

<strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Education <strong>Research</strong> Students’ <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> (<strong>RSAC</strong>) <strong>2010</strong><br />

24 November, University House, University <strong>of</strong> Leeds<br />

Abstracts<br />

Name<br />

Email<br />

Title<br />

10.00 – 10.25 Parallel sessions 1<br />

Nahieli Greaves<br />

nahielig@yahoo.com<br />

Decision-making on pseudoscientific issues: the role <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> science<br />

It has been argued that a sophisticated understanding <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> science (NOS) can help students<br />

distinguish between science and pseudoscience. However, up until now the role played by the NOS in<br />

decision-making about pseudoscientific issues remains controversial. As part <strong>of</strong> this study, the role<br />

played by the NOS in decisions about pseudoscientific issues, and whether its use is itself influenced<br />

by the context, were assessed. Three scenarios were designed to probe students‘ decision-making and<br />

its underlying rationale: weight-loss pills, Aids denialism and quantum medicine. The first two<br />

touched upon topics students were familiar with, whereas the last was new to them. 128<br />

undergraduates were asked to make, and justify, a decision about whether to use a therapy or health<br />

product. They tended to reject the claims made by Aids denialists and weight-loss pills sellers, while<br />

remaining open to the claims <strong>of</strong> quantum medicine advocates. Whenever students used the NOS to<br />

justify their decisions, they rejected the pseudoscientific claims. In contrast, justifications outside the<br />

scope <strong>of</strong> the NOS led students to accept them. These findings suggest that the NOS is useful in<br />

distinguishing science from pseudoscience, independently <strong>of</strong> the context.<br />

Name<br />

Email<br />

Title<br />

10.00 – 10.25 Parallel sessions 2<br />

Michael Hepworth<br />

edmdh@leeds.ac.uk<br />

The teaching and learning <strong>of</strong> spoken argumentation in ESOL classrooms<br />

What is argumentation? How do teachers and learners engage with it in ESOL classrooms?<br />

In this session I will present a short stretch <strong>of</strong> data gathered as part <strong>of</strong> my investigation into the<br />

teaching and learning <strong>of</strong> argumentation in an ESOL context. This data will form the basis <strong>of</strong> the rest<br />

<strong>of</strong> the presentation and some discussion.<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!