05.05.2015 Views

Download REHIS Journal 21/3 (Autumn 2009) - The Royal ...

Download REHIS Journal 21/3 (Autumn 2009) - The Royal ...

Download REHIS Journal 21/3 (Autumn 2009) - The Royal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Environmental Health Scotland<br />

HSE LAU NEWS<br />

by Tony Hetherington, Head of Local Authority Unit, Health and Safety Executive<br />

This last quarter has seen the finalisation and launch<br />

of HSE’s strategy, ‘<strong>The</strong> Health and Safety of Great<br />

Britain - Be part of the solution’ and I’d like to reflect<br />

a little on this document.<br />

From my perspective one of the most important aspects<br />

of the strategy was the recognition by Judith Hackitt<br />

in her foreword that HSE and local authorities had<br />

a ‘strong co-regulator partnership’. Whilst we<br />

haven’t yet cracked every issue between HSE and<br />

local authorities we now work together as equals and<br />

respect the strengths that both sides bring to our<br />

shared mission of reducing workplace accidents<br />

and ill-health. As a result of the efforts and flexibility<br />

of so many inspectors in both local authorities and<br />

HSE, we have come a very long way in developing<br />

our relationship since the strategy published in<br />

2004 concluded that we needed to work together in<br />

partnership. I’d like to take this opportunity to say<br />

many thanks to all of you that have worked so hard to<br />

make that vision a reality.<br />

<strong>The</strong> strategy clearly signals that the HSE Board<br />

wishes to see a new approach to the way we go about<br />

securing improvements in workplace health and<br />

safety. Of particular relevance to the way local<br />

authorities go about this will be in the fields of<br />

leadership, involving the workforce, building<br />

competence and supporting small and medium sized<br />

businesses. Work is underway to put more flesh<br />

on these bones and incorporate these aspects into<br />

inspection regimes. This will undoubtedly generate<br />

some challenges, but I’m absolutely convinced that<br />

the effort will pay dividends.<br />

Undoubtedly, changes in approach will be needed<br />

in order to respond to the strategy. However, I believe<br />

the concerns expressed by some that inspectors<br />

don’t know how to respond to the new approach<br />

are unfounded. I have even heard it said that the<br />

Fit3 priorities are no longer relevant and inspectors<br />

will be asked to inspect for ‘leadership’. Nothing<br />

could be further from the truth. <strong>The</strong> priorities for<br />

action, slips and trips, falls, transport, etc…. remain<br />

relevant and the same standards need to be achieved to<br />

prevent accidents and ill-health. <strong>The</strong> questions at the<br />

heart of any inspection will remain; is the business<br />

achieving a satisfactory standard? If not, what do they<br />

need to do to meet the standard?<br />

How inspectors should then go about securing<br />

improvement will focus on, at the most basic, ensuring<br />

the commitment of those in charge of the business<br />

to lead the necessary improvement, that they<br />

should involve the workforce in identifying how<br />

improvements can be identified and implemented.<br />

In some businesses this may involve training for<br />

managers, workers or both to build their competence.<br />

And these issues will be particularly relevant in<br />

small firms.<br />

I am sure you will all recognise that these steps are<br />

essential if a business is to improve and to sustain<br />

necessary improvement and that as inspectors, you<br />

already have a considerable toolkit of techniques<br />

to achieve these ends. In responding to the strategy,<br />

we intend to develop these techniques, expand the<br />

range of new techniques and embed them all in<br />

structured approaches to inspection. However, we<br />

must never forget what we are ultimately about - driving<br />

change for the better!<br />

However, changes in approach to the strategy will<br />

also go deeper than a simple restatement and<br />

repackaging of the same old things. For example,<br />

in relation to competence, this means making sure<br />

everyone is competent to fulfil their role. Managers<br />

must be competent to identify risk, develop control<br />

measures and provide the leadership to make change<br />

happen in the workplace. Workers must be competent<br />

to carry out operations safely. Worker representatives<br />

need to understand risk, to be able to communicate<br />

with their fellow workers and represent their views<br />

to managers. Consultants need to be competent in<br />

matching their expertise to the needs of their clients<br />

and providing advice that businesses can apply.<br />

And, of course, we as inspectors must be competent<br />

to bring all this together to improve standards in the<br />

workplace.<br />

We also need to look at how we engage with small<br />

businesses - how we tailor guidance to the needs<br />

of small businesses and how we ensure that they<br />

can identify and access local, good quality advice.<br />

This is an area where HSE can learn from local<br />

authorities. Many authorities and professional bodies<br />

like <strong>REHIS</strong> do great work in generating clear<br />

practical guidance and delivering that guidance to those<br />

who need it at the local level.<br />

Work is in hand to develop new approaches<br />

to inspection, both in the way it is done and who<br />

might be the target of our inspections.<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!