Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WEDNESDAY MAY 20, 2015 • THISDAY 11<br />
NEWS<br />
Court Stops Jonathan from<br />
Signing Amended Oil and<br />
Gas Bill<br />
Davidson Iriekpen<br />
Justice Saliu Saidu of the Federal<br />
High Court in Lagos yesterday<br />
restrained President Goodluck<br />
Jonathan from assenting to the<br />
bill for an Act to amend the Oil<br />
and Gas Export Free Zone Act.<br />
The judge also restrained the<br />
National Assembly, the Clerk<br />
of the National Assembly from<br />
forwarding the bill for an Act to<br />
Amend the Oil and Gas Export<br />
Free Zone Authority Act. Cap.<br />
05 to the president for assent.<br />
He also restrained the<br />
defendants, their agents and<br />
privies from prohibiting the<br />
usage of the plaintiffs’ facilities<br />
at Snake Island Integrated Free<br />
Zone for Oil and Gas cargoes<br />
destined for use in the free zone.<br />
The order was sequel to a<br />
motion ex-parte, in a suit number<br />
FHC/L/CS/719/15, filed before<br />
the court by Professor Olanrewaju<br />
Fagboun, on behalf of Niger<br />
Dock Nigeria Limited, Simco<br />
Free Zone Company and Niger<br />
Dock Nigeria Plc-FZE, who are<br />
plaintiffs in the suit.<br />
The court also restrained the<br />
National Assembly, the Clerk<br />
of the National Assembly,<br />
the Attorney-General of the<br />
Federation, Minister of Industry,<br />
Trade and Investment, the<br />
Minister of Transport, and the<br />
Nigeria Ports Authority (NPA).<br />
In an affidavit sworn to by<br />
Yusufu Abdullahi, the Director<br />
of Simco Free Zone Company,<br />
the deponent averred that<br />
Niger Dock Nigeria Limited<br />
is a promoter of Snake Island<br />
Integrated Free Zone (SIIFZ), and<br />
that the Simco is a company<br />
saddled with the responsibility<br />
to develop, market, manage,<br />
operate, and administer SIIFZ.<br />
The deponent averred that<br />
Tobi Soniyi in Abuja<br />
After several adjournment,<br />
the federal government<br />
yesterday began the trial of<br />
the alleged master mind of<br />
the Nyanya bomb blast, Aminu<br />
Sadiq Ogwuche and five others<br />
before the Federal High Court<br />
sitting in Abuja.<br />
Others are Ahmed Abubakar,<br />
Mohammed Ishaq, Ya’u Saidu<br />
(alias Kofar Rama); Anas Isa,<br />
Adamu Yusuf and Nasir<br />
Abubakar.<br />
The accused persons were<br />
charged with terrorism for<br />
bombing Nyanya motor park,<br />
in the Federal Capital Territory<br />
(FCT), Abuja.<br />
The trial was initially<br />
scheduled to commence last<br />
week, but could not go ahead<br />
because of the absence of the<br />
prosecution witnesses.<br />
At the resumed trial<br />
yesterday, prosecution counsel,<br />
Mohammed Diri, told the court<br />
that he had 37 exhibits and<br />
six witnesses to tender before<br />
the court<br />
He also told the court that<br />
an eight-count charge was filed<br />
against the suspects contrary<br />
SIIFZ was approved as a<br />
privately owned and managed<br />
Free Zone by a presidential<br />
declaration in January 2005,<br />
and was duly licensed by<br />
the Nigeria Export Processing<br />
Zones Authority (NEPZA), in<br />
April 2005.<br />
He said SIIFZ is operated<br />
by Simco Free Zone Company,<br />
under the direct supervision and<br />
monitoring of NEPZA.<br />
He added that other regulatory<br />
agencies such as Nigeria Ports<br />
Authority (NPA), Nigerian<br />
Customs Service (NCS), the<br />
Nigerian Immigration Service<br />
(NIS), the Nigeria Police Force<br />
(NPF), and State Security Service<br />
(SSS), are present within SIIFZ<br />
to ensure due compliance with<br />
all laws and that appropriate<br />
security is maintained.<br />
Abdullahi also averred that<br />
at that privatisation, one of the<br />
representation that the federal<br />
government as beneficial owner<br />
made to the core investor<br />
who purchased the federal<br />
government share in the Niger<br />
Dock Nigeria Limited was that<br />
the federal government shall take<br />
all necessary steps to co-operate<br />
fully with the purchaser to ensure<br />
that the purchaser obtains all<br />
benefits under Nigerian law as<br />
a strategic core investor in the<br />
company.<br />
He averred that in November<br />
2014, the plaintiffs became aware<br />
that a Bill for An Act to Amend<br />
the Oil and Gas Export Free Zone<br />
Authority Act, Cap. 05, Laws of<br />
the Federation of Nigeria, has<br />
been presented to the Senate of<br />
the National Assembly. And that<br />
the plaintiffs were not invited<br />
to the public hearing that the<br />
Senate of the National Assembly<br />
had in respect of the bill.<br />
Notwithstanding, he stated that<br />
to Sections 1(2a), 5, 8, 16, and<br />
17 of the Terrorism Prevention<br />
(amendment) Act, 2013.<br />
The first witness, tagged<br />
prosecution witness 1, an<br />
investigator with the Directorate<br />
of State Security (DSS), told the<br />
court that he met the accused<br />
persons while investigating the<br />
bomb blasts that led to close<br />
to a hundred deaths.<br />
He said: “I came to know<br />
the accused persons during<br />
the cause of my investigation.<br />
Ahmad Abubakar was the first<br />
to be arrested on April 22, 2014 in<br />
Sanga, Kaduna State; Mohammed<br />
Sani Ishaq was arrested in Jabi,<br />
FCT on April 24, 2014; Yau was<br />
arrested on April 29 in Kano<br />
state; Mohammed Annas was<br />
arrested in Katsina State on May<br />
3, 2014. The next to be arrested<br />
was Adamu Haruna Yusuf, on<br />
May 5 in Bauchi State, while<br />
Aminu Ogwuche was arrested<br />
in Sudan and extradited to<br />
Nigeria on July 15, 2014.”<br />
He said he knew Ogwuche<br />
way back in 2011 when he<br />
was deported to Nigeria<br />
from the United Kingdom for<br />
belonging to a banned terrorist<br />
organisation.<br />
At a point, Ogwuche’s<br />
the plaintiffs submitted a petition<br />
to the Senate when they became<br />
aware that a public hearing had<br />
been conducted. He added<br />
that the petition was aimed at<br />
sensitising the Senate on how<br />
the amendment will negatively<br />
undermine the plaintiffs and<br />
violate their constitutional rights.<br />
The deponent averred that<br />
Section 5(3) of the bill seeks to<br />
expand the powers of OGFZA<br />
such that it can without further<br />
assurance take over and perform<br />
the functions hitherto performed<br />
by NEPZA.<br />
While Section 10 of the bill<br />
further seeks to confer the rights<br />
to handle oil and gas cargoes<br />
only at approved oil and gas<br />
concessioned ports, with freedom<br />
to investors to choose ports of<br />
discharge of their cargoes within<br />
designated terminal at Onne,<br />
Warri and Calabar ports.<br />
He stated that the bill did not<br />
define what constitute “oil and<br />
gas related cargoes,” and that<br />
this will give room to situations<br />
where cargoes intended for SIIFZ<br />
are wrongly classified as oil and<br />
gas relates cargoes.<br />
The deponent further averred<br />
that, it is a known fact that a<br />
total of twenty-four ports were<br />
concessioned to private investors,<br />
with 14 and 10 in the western<br />
and eastern zones of NPA<br />
respectively.<br />
He stated that only one<br />
of the port concessionaires,<br />
Integrated Logistic Services<br />
Limited (INTELS) operates<br />
in Warri, Onne and Calabar<br />
ports and that the amendment<br />
proposed in Section 10 will<br />
confer a right of monopoly<br />
only on INTELS, which he<br />
said will be to the deterrent<br />
of other port concessionaires<br />
and free zones.<br />
Trial of Nyanya Bomb Blast Suspects<br />
Finally Begins<br />
counsel, Ahmed Raji (SAN),<br />
interjected, arguing that “the<br />
suspect is not standing trial on<br />
whether or not he is a member<br />
of a terrorist group banned in<br />
the UK.”<br />
He opposed the evidence<br />
saying the prosecution did not<br />
tell the court of the deportation<br />
order and therefore could not<br />
give evidence on its content.<br />
Raji said the evidence PW1<br />
was giving was irrelevant to<br />
counts 1, 3,4,5,6,7 and 8 leveled<br />
against Ogwuche, saying “even<br />
if the evidence is relevant, it has<br />
to pass a test of admissibility.<br />
The PW1 has to produce the<br />
CTC of the deportation order.”<br />
He urged the court to<br />
discountenance the evidence.<br />
All counsel to the other<br />
accused persons associated<br />
themselves with Raji’s<br />
submission.<br />
Diri, however, urged the court<br />
to allow PW1 to continue with<br />
his evidence, saying, the matter<br />
bordered on terrorism.<br />
In a ruling, the trial judge,<br />
Justice Ahmed Mohammed,<br />
upheld the objection of Raji,<br />
saying PW1 was barred from<br />
giving such evidence unless<br />
he had the deportation order.