01.06.2015 Views

Homework Assignment #2

Homework Assignment #2

Homework Assignment #2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Solutions for <strong>Homework</strong> <strong>Assignment</strong> <strong>#2</strong><br />

2-1<br />

n p n f(p n ) n p n f(p n )<br />

1 0.5 −0.170476 6 0.640625 −0.00133182<br />

2 0.75 0.134337 7 0.648438 0.00822774<br />

3 0.625 −0.0203937 8 0.644531 0.00344555<br />

4 0.6875 0.0563213 9 0.642578 0.00105626<br />

5 0.65626 0.0178067 10 0.641602 −0.000137933<br />

2-2 p 13 = 1.7320557, p = 1.732050807568877, and |p − p 13 | = 4.86 × 10 −6 .<br />

2-4<br />

(a) p n f(p n ) (b) p n f(p n )<br />

0 1.18921 0.63922 0 1.22474 1.02526<br />

1 1.08006 −0.386228 1 0.993666 −1.04402<br />

2 1.14967 0.240826 2 1.22857 1.06842<br />

3 1.10782 −0.147105 3 0.987506 −1.08621<br />

(c) p n f(p n ) (d) p n f(p n )<br />

0 1.1547 0.289744 0 1.14286 0.175344<br />

1 1.11643 −0.0700688 1 1.12448 0.0032932<br />

2 1.12605 0.0177429 2 1.1241231639 1.23208 × 10 −6<br />

3 1.12364 −0.00444148 3 1.124123029704334 1.72659 × 10 −13<br />

Hence the (d) is the best iterative function.<br />

2-5 (i) Since A > 0 and x 0 > 0, x 1 = 1 2 x 0 + A<br />

2x 0<br />

> 0. Then x n > 0 for all n. Suppose x n converges to p ≥ 0, then<br />

p = 1 2 p + A 2p ⇒ p = √ A.<br />

(ii) If x 0 < 0, then x 1 = 1 2 x 0 + A<br />

2x 0<br />

< 0. Then x n < 0 for all n. Then x n converges to p ≤ 0, then<br />

p = 1 2 p + A 2p ⇒ p = −√ A.<br />

2-6 f(x) = x 2 − 6, f ′ (x) = 2x, and p 0 = 1, the Newton’s method p n+1 = p n − f(p n)<br />

f ′ (p n ) . Then p 1 = 1 − f(1)<br />

f ′ (1) = 3.5<br />

and p 2 = 3.5 − f(3.5)<br />

f ′ (3.5) = 2.607. (The exact solution √ 6 ≈ 2.4494897)<br />

2-7 The Secant method and False Position is p n = p n−1 − f(p n−1)(p n−1 − p n−2 )<br />

, p 0 = 3, p 1 = 2.<br />

f(p n−1 ) − f(p n−2 )<br />

(a) p 0 = 3, p 1 = 2, f(p 0 ) = 3 and f(p 1 ) = −2. Then p 2 = p 1 − f(p 1)(p 1 − p 0 )<br />

f(p 1 ) − f(p 0 ) = 2.4, and f(p 2) = −0.24.<br />

Then we have p 3 = p 2 − f(p 2)(p 2 − p 1 )<br />

f(p 2 ) − f(p 1 ) = 2.45454.<br />

(b) As in the Secant method. Since f(p 1 ) < 0 and f(p 2 ) < 0, then p 3 = p 2 − f(p 2)(p 2 − p 0 )<br />

f(p 2 ) − f(p 0 ) = 2.44444.<br />

The exact solution √ 6 ≈ 2.4494897. Hence (b) is closer to √ 6.<br />

2-8 f(x) = (x − p) m q(x) where lim q(x) ≠ 0. Then<br />

x→p<br />

m(x − p) m q(x)<br />

g(x) = x −<br />

m(x − p) m−1 q(x) + (x − p) m q ′ (x) = x − m(x − p)q(x)<br />

mq(x) + (x − p)q ′ (x) .<br />

Therefore, g ′ (p) = 1 − mq(p)[mq(p)]<br />

[mq(p)] 2<br />

= 0. If f ′′′ is continuous, the sequence produces quadratic convergence.<br />

p − p n+1 (b − a)/2 n+1<br />

2-9 lim = lim<br />

n→∞ p − p n n→∞ (b − a)/2 n = 1 . Then the Bisection Algorithm is linearly convergence.<br />

2<br />

2-10 For g(x) = 0.5(x + 3 x ) and p 0 = 0.5, then p 4 = 1.73205.<br />

2-11 (a) ˆp 10 = 0.0 ¯45, (b) ˆp 2 = 0.0363.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!