Current US Security Practice for Hydro Facilities - iPresas

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Options to Permanent Closure Closures based on specific threat 26 th February 2008 Valencia Workshop Robin Charlwood & Rudy Matalucci
Options ♦ Relocate a facility further from the dam or vulnerable area in order to provide public access Example- A licensee relocated its visitor center further from the perceived vulnerable area in order to continue to provide educational programs ♦ Opening access points during specific times such as peak weekends, special events, and holidays. 26 th February 2008 Valencia Workshop Robin Charlwood & Rudy Matalucci
Page 1 and 2: Current US Security Practice for Hy
Page 3 and 4: FERC Security Program for Hydropowe
Page 5 and 6: Requirements for FERC dams: Require
Page 7 and 8: Documents Required by FERC Vulnerab
Page 9 and 10: Documents Required by FERC Recovery
Page 11 and 12: Documents Required by FERC Integrat
Page 13 and 14: RESULTS OF LICENSEE VULNERABILITY/S
Page 15 and 16: An Issue - Recreation at Hydropower
Page 17: What Can A Dam Owner Do? ♦ Provid
Page 21 and 22: Vulnerability & Risk Assessment Met
Page 23 and 24: VA Analysis (Simplified RAM-D) II.
Page 25 and 26: VA Analysis (Simplified Ram-D) III.
Page 27 and 28: VA Analysis (“Simplified Ram-D”
Page 29 and 30: DAMS-VR Step Description Table Rema
Page 31 and 32: RAM-D/T - Risk Assessment Methodolo
Page 33 and 34: RAMCAP - Dams Sector Risk Assessmen

Current US Security Practice for Hydro Facilities - iPresas

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?