02.06.2015 Views

Politics of Obedience

Politics of Obedience

Politics of Obedience

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In the ferment <strong>of</strong> his law school days at Orleans, Étienne de<br />

La Boétie composed his brief but scintillating, pr<strong>of</strong>ound and<br />

deeply radical Discourse <strong>of</strong> Voluntary Servitude (Discours de la<br />

Servitude Volontaire). 4 The Discourse was circulated in<br />

manuscript form and never published by La Boétie. One can<br />

speculate that its radical views were an important reason for the<br />

author's with holding it from publication. It achieved a<br />

considerable fame in local Perigordian intellectual circles,<br />

however. This can be seen by the fact that Montaigne had read<br />

the essay long before he first met La Boétie as a fellow member<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Bordeaux Parlement in 1559.<br />

The first striking thing about the Discourse is the form: La<br />

Boétie's method was speculative, abstract, deductive. This<br />

contrasts with the rather narrowly legal and historical argument<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Huguenot monarchomach writers (those sectarian writers<br />

who argued for the right <strong>of</strong> subjects to resist unjust rulers) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

1570's and 1580's, whom La Boétie resembled in his opposition<br />

to tyranny. While the Huguenot monarchomachs, best<br />

exemplified by Francois Hotman's Franco-Gallia (1573),<br />

concentrated on grounding their arguments on real or presumed<br />

historical precedents in French laws and institutions, La Boétie's<br />

4 Having remained long in manuscript, the actual date <strong>of</strong> writing the Discourse <strong>of</strong><br />

Voluntary Servitude remains a matter <strong>of</strong> dispute. It seems clear, however, and has been<br />

so accepted by recent authorities, that Montaigne's published story that La Boetie wrote<br />

the Discourse at the age <strong>of</strong> eighteen or even <strong>of</strong> sixteen was incorrect. Montaigne's<br />

statement, as we shall see further below, was probably part <strong>of</strong> his later .:ampalgn to guard<br />

his dead friend's reputation by dissociating him from the revolutionary Huguenots who<br />

were claiming La Boetie's pamphlet for their own. Extreme youth tended to cast the<br />

Discourse in the light <strong>of</strong> a work so youthful that the radical content was hardly to be<br />

taken seriously as the views <strong>of</strong> the author. Internal evidence as well as the erudition<br />

expressed in the work make it likely that the Discourse was written in 1552 or 1553, at<br />

the age <strong>of</strong> twenty-two, while La Boetie was at the University. See Bonnefon, op. cit., pp.<br />

xxxvi-xxxvii; Mesnard, op. cit., pp. 390-1; and Donald Frame, Montaigne: A Biography<br />

(New York: Harcourt Brace, & World, 1965), p. 71. There is no biography <strong>of</strong> La Boetie.<br />

Closest to it is Bonnefon's "Introduction" to his Oeuvres Completes, op. cit., pp. xi-Ixxxv,<br />

later reprinted as part <strong>of</strong> Paul Bonnefon, Montaigne et ses Amis (Paris: Armand Colin et<br />

Cie., 1898), I, pp. 103-224.<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!