09.07.2015 Views

View / Download - County Court of Victoria

View / Download - County Court of Victoria

View / Download - County Court of Victoria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

How We ManageCasesJudges manage cases under theCrimes (Criminal Trials) Act 1999[Crimes (CT) Act]. The purpose <strong>of</strong>this Act is to increase the capacity forjudicial management <strong>of</strong> criminal trialsin order to more efficiently managethe process <strong>of</strong> criminal hearings.The Crimes (CT) Act provides for:• full and complete disclosure bythe prosecution;• a required summary <strong>of</strong> theCrown opening given by theprosecution to the defencebefore trial so that the defenceknows how the Crown proposesto present its case;• a required response to thatopening given by the defencebefore trial and to state whatmatters are in issue in the trial;and• a mechanism by which theCrown may serve a notice <strong>of</strong>pre-trial admissions on thedefence requiring the defenceto respond to that notice.The Crimes (CT) Act emphasisespre-trial court control <strong>of</strong> criminalproceedings. One or more Judges,whose rulings will be operative ontrial, administer pre-trial procedures.During 2004–05 two Judges conductedpre-trial hearings casesunder the Crimes (CT) Act inMelbourne. In addition, threeJudges regularly visited countrylocations to conduct pre-trial hearingsin order to expedite matters atcountry locations.In Melbourne, Criminal Judgesconducted 1,374 case conferences,1,054 directions hearings and 552video links to prisons, including83 links to country locations, 32interstate links and 16 overseaslinks.Managing Long TrialsThe <strong>Court</strong> considers any trial thatruns five weeks or longer to be a‘long trial’. The Listing Judges referthese trials to Judge Strong and theyare listed before him for mention.Judge Strong handled all pre-trialissues and allocated a hearing dateindependently <strong>of</strong> the normal <strong>Court</strong>hearing dates provided by theRegistry, with a view to avoiding anylong delays and encouraging partiesto prepare their cases. Judge Strongthen identified a Judge who wouldbe available for the period the trialwas scheduled to run and allocateda Judge to manage and hear thetrial. No statistics are available forthis reporting period with respect tolong trials.Listing <strong>of</strong> TrialsThe <strong>Court</strong> aims to manage the listing<strong>of</strong> trials and pleas so that theresources <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Court</strong>, includingcourtrooms and Judges, are utilisedeffectively and efficiently. In thereporting year, the difficulties associatedwith listing all new trials on aMonday (about 18 per week) withincreased numbers <strong>of</strong> pleas andappeals listed for later in the week,were the subject <strong>of</strong> discussionamong Judges and Registry staff. The<strong>Court</strong> considered whether thismethod could be further improvedby listing trials to commence oneach day <strong>of</strong> the week; our primaryaim being to avoid bringing partiesto the courtroom door, only to haveto tell them that the resources <strong>of</strong> the<strong>Court</strong> prohibit the hearing <strong>of</strong> scheduledcases. For the most part, the<strong>Court</strong> has been able to deal with thelisted cases, while aiming to refineExamples <strong>of</strong> a Criminal Trial and an Appeal from the Magistrates’ <strong>Court</strong> Progressingthrough the <strong>Court</strong>Trial to Hear Case Involving Sexual Offences.23 July 2004Committal Hearing in Magistrates<strong>Court</strong>:• Accused pleads not guilty• Committed for trial in the <strong>County</strong><strong>Court</strong> on 25 October 2004 onseveral sexual assault charges.29 July 2004Directions Hearing listed for23 September 2004.8 September 2004Depositions filed.22 September 2004Crown Opening filed.23 September 2004Directions Hearing Orders made.Trial Date confirmed.25 October 2004Trial commences.Jury empanelled.1 November 2004Jury discharged—unable to reachverdict.5 January 2005Case listed for retrial on 19 May 2005.19 May 2005Trial commences.20 May 2005Jury returns a verdict <strong>of</strong> not guilty.Appeal Where Appellant is in Custody.4 March 2005Appeal listed for 13 April 2005.9 March 2005Advice sent to prison regardinghearing date.12 April 2005Order to bring the appellant to<strong>Court</strong> issued.13 April 2005Appeal heard and orders made.<strong>Court</strong> Performance 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!