10.07.2015 Views

Richard Bird - Institute for Public Economics - University of Alberta

Richard Bird - Institute for Public Economics - University of Alberta

Richard Bird - Institute for Public Economics - University of Alberta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

potential trade-<strong>of</strong>fs even within the health care sector, let alone between healthand other social policy expenditures are seldom discussed analytically, still lessthe possibility <strong>of</strong> broader trade-<strong>of</strong>fs with the effects <strong>of</strong> the level and structure <strong>of</strong>taxation on social well-being.Tax Resistance and Social PolicyWhatever one thinks <strong>of</strong> such arguments, I suggest that it is almost certainlytrue that we can and should do much better in spending our social policyresources, almost regardless <strong>of</strong> the amount we have to spend. Indeed, I shallgo further and suggest that at least some <strong>of</strong> the current pressure <strong>for</strong> taxreduction may have originated from a basically correct perception on the part<strong>of</strong> many citizens that they have, on average, been paying more in the <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong>taxes and gettingless in the way <strong>of</strong> servicesthey value. 11Many have argued in recent years that the economic cost <strong>of</strong> taxation hasincreased owing to globalization pressures. 12 While such pressures mayindeed have affected the structure <strong>of</strong> taxation, making it more difficult, <strong>for</strong>instance, to raise taxes on corporations, it is not clear they have as yet hadany significant effect on the tolerable level <strong>of</strong> total taxation. Indeed, I suggesta better case can be made that the marginal political cost <strong>of</strong> increased taxationhas risen significantly since the hey-day <strong>of</strong> social policy expansion in the 1960sand 1970s, both because taxes hurt more and expenditures are valued less.13From 1985 to 1995, <strong>for</strong> example, total government revenues rose from 40.0 to43.8 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP, with 84 percent <strong>of</strong> this increase in taxation taking thehighly visible <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> higher personal income taxes, and another 11 percent <strong>of</strong>the increase being accounted <strong>for</strong> by almost equally visible property taxes.14Over a decade during which real disposable personal income barely increased,11 For an earlier sketch <strong>of</strong> this argument (and a slightly less rough attemptto quantify it), see <strong>Richard</strong> M. <strong>Bird</strong>, "Closing the Scissors, or The Real <strong>Public</strong>Sector has Two Sides," National Tax Journal, 35 (December 1982), 477-81.12Indeed, to some extent I have done so myself: see <strong>Richard</strong> M. <strong>Bird</strong> andCharles E. McLure, "The Personal Income Tax in an Interdependent World,"in Sijbren Cnossen and <strong>Richard</strong> M. <strong>Bird</strong>, eds., The Personal Income Tax(Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990).13 The concept <strong>of</strong> marginal political cost is developed in Walter Hettich andStanley L. Winer, "Economic and Political Foundations <strong>of</strong> Tax Structure,"American Economic Review, 78 (1988),701-12, and applied to Canada in W.Irwin Gillespie, Tax, Borrow and Spend: Financing Federal Spending inCanada, 1867-1990 (Ottawa: Carleton <strong>University</strong> Press, 1991).14Calculated from Perry, op.cit. in note 5, pp. 857-58, and Karin Treff andDavid B. Perry, 1996 Finances <strong>of</strong> the Nation (Toronto: Canadian TaxFoundation, 1997), p. A:3.7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!