10.07.2015 Views

Conditional Cash Transfer Program in the Philippines: Is It Reaching ...

Conditional Cash Transfer Program in the Philippines: Is It Reaching ...

Conditional Cash Transfer Program in the Philippines: Is It Reaching ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

poor (those liv<strong>in</strong>g below subsistence level). In 2009, <strong>the</strong>re are about 2 million familiesconsidered to be subsistence poor or those who are extremely poor <strong>the</strong>y could not even afford tomeet <strong>the</strong>ir basic food needs. This amounts to roughly only more than a third of <strong>the</strong> current totalnumber of poor households, at 5.2 million, be<strong>in</strong>g used by <strong>the</strong> 4Ps as its universe of poorhouseholds. In <strong>the</strong> Bolsa Familia of Brazil, <strong>the</strong> difference <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> conditions of <strong>the</strong> poor has beentaken <strong>in</strong>to account when <strong>the</strong>y differentiated <strong>the</strong> amount of transfer given to <strong>the</strong> extremely poorand <strong>the</strong> moderately poor. In Soares, Osorio, Soares, Medeiros, and Zepeda (2007), <strong>the</strong> maximumamount of transfer <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bolsa Familia to a family of extreme poverty is roughly $91 PPP permonth for each family while <strong>the</strong> moderately poor receives up to only $42 PPP.Moreover, <strong>the</strong> poor consists of <strong>the</strong> chronically or persistently poor and <strong>the</strong> transient pooror those who become poor because of certa<strong>in</strong> shocks. In fact, more than half (52.6%) of Filip<strong>in</strong>ofamilies who are classified as poor <strong>in</strong> 2009 were transient poor. These are households who aremov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> and out of poverty. Only 47.4 percent of poor households <strong>in</strong> 2009 were consistentlypoor s<strong>in</strong>ce 2003 (Reyes, et al., 2011). These two groups have vary<strong>in</strong>g characteristics. Thechronic poor face constra<strong>in</strong>ts that are caused by <strong>the</strong>ir lack of capacity; <strong>the</strong>y are mostlyuneducated and are more likely to perpetuate poverty (i.e. <strong>in</strong>tergenerational poverty) because<strong>the</strong>y could not send <strong>the</strong>ir children to school. Poverty reduction <strong>in</strong>tervention for this group takessusta<strong>in</strong>ed efforts. The transient poor meanwhile are those who become poor dur<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong>periods due to economic shocks or natural calamities but may be able to recover when given crop<strong>in</strong>surance, access to credit or emergency employment programs. They have better capacity than<strong>the</strong> chronic poor and <strong>the</strong>ir needs may be <strong>in</strong>termittent. The CCT program, as we know it, normallycaters to <strong>the</strong> chronic poor or <strong>the</strong> extremely poor, as. In <strong>the</strong> target<strong>in</strong>g scheme of <strong>the</strong> 4Ps however,such heterogeneity of <strong>the</strong> poor was not taken <strong>in</strong>to consideration.Size of <strong>the</strong> cash transferIn provid<strong>in</strong>g cash grants, programs also need to account for <strong>the</strong> distance of <strong>the</strong> poor from<strong>the</strong> poverty l<strong>in</strong>e to ensure that <strong>the</strong> amount is of value that would yield an impact. On <strong>the</strong> average,<strong>the</strong> chronic poor’s <strong>in</strong>come has to be augmented by around 5000 pesos per person annually (orabout 32% of <strong>the</strong> poverty threshold) to meet <strong>the</strong> poverty l<strong>in</strong>e based on 2009 <strong>in</strong>come data of <strong>the</strong>chronic poor and 2009 poverty l<strong>in</strong>e. This amount represents <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>come gap of <strong>the</strong> chronic poorfrom <strong>the</strong> poverty l<strong>in</strong>e. The 4Ps provide poor families of five members a maximum amount of15,000 pesos annually (assum<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>y have 3 eligible children) or 3,000 per person. Withthis amount, only around a quarter of <strong>the</strong> chronic poor (26%) are able to get out of povertyassum<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>y do not get exposed to significant economic shocks. Meanwhile, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>come of <strong>the</strong>transient poor has to be augmented by around 3,400 pesos per person annually. Given <strong>the</strong> actualper capita <strong>in</strong>come of <strong>the</strong> transient poor <strong>in</strong> 2009, <strong>the</strong> 4Ps cash grant can lift only about half of <strong>the</strong>transient poor out of <strong>in</strong>come poverty.9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!