Kent Bressie and Madeleine Findley Analyze the Impact - Wiltshire ...
Kent Bressie and Madeleine Findley Analyze the Impact - Wiltshire ...
Kent Bressie and Madeleine Findley Analyze the Impact - Wiltshire ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
15wake of <strong>the</strong> President’s action,Representatives Mike Rogers (R-Mich.)<strong>and</strong> Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Md.)reintroduced <strong>the</strong> Cyber IntelligenceSharing <strong>and</strong> Protection Act (“CISPA”),which passed <strong>the</strong> House but not<strong>the</strong> Senate in <strong>the</strong> last Congress. TheHouse Permanent Select Committee onIntelligence held a hearing on <strong>the</strong> billon February 14, 2013, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Secretaryof Homel<strong>and</strong> Security testified beforea hearing of <strong>the</strong> Senate Committee onHomel<strong>and</strong> Security <strong>and</strong> GovernmentalAffairs on cybersecurity issues onMarch 7, 2013. Before passing anylegislation, however, Congress mustfirst resolve several key contentiousissues, including whe<strong>the</strong>r to m<strong>and</strong>atespecific cybersecurity st<strong>and</strong>ards orprovide liability protection to industry.Representative Mike McCaul (R-Tex.),chairman of <strong>the</strong> House’s Homel<strong>and</strong>Security Committee, <strong>and</strong> SenatorTom Carper (D-Del.), chairman of<strong>the</strong> Senate’s top homel<strong>and</strong> securitycommittee, have both expressed <strong>the</strong>irintent to push for legislation in <strong>the</strong>coming months. 55. Preliminary Recommendations forIndustry InvolvementGiven <strong>the</strong> risks <strong>and</strong> uncertainties of <strong>the</strong>5. See, e.g., Rep. Michael McCaul, Opinion, Hardening Our Defenses Against Cyberwarfare,Wall St. J., Mar. 6, 2013, available at http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324662404578336862508763442.html; Rep. Michael McCaul,Statement, Legislation Needed to Bolster Cybersecurity Executive Order, Feb. 12,2013, available at http://homel<strong>and</strong>.house.gov/press-release/legislation-needed-bolster-cybersecurity-executive-order.processes established by <strong>the</strong> ExecutiveOrder <strong>and</strong> PPD, we think it importantfor <strong>the</strong> undersea cable industry to takeseveral actions. First, <strong>the</strong> industryshould participate actively in <strong>the</strong>st<strong>and</strong>ards-development <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rimplementation proceedings alreadybegun by various U.S. Governmentagencies, including <strong>the</strong> NIST RFI <strong>and</strong>stakeholder meetings. Second, it shouldcontinue to monitor <strong>and</strong> influencecybersecurity legislation. If possible,it should consider introducing o<strong>the</strong>rcable-protection elements in suchlegislation, including an increasein <strong>the</strong> statutory penalties for cabledamage <strong>and</strong> a broader definition ofcable damage. Third, it should engageproactively with U.S. Governmentagencies, <strong>the</strong> U.S. Congress, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rstakeholders to share informationabout existing industry cybersecurityefforts <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> impact of proposalsfor new or additional compliancerequirements. Fourth, it should takeany <strong>and</strong> all opportunities to remind<strong>the</strong> U.S. Government <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rstakeholders of <strong>the</strong> critical importanceof undersea cable infrastructure <strong>and</strong>services to <strong>the</strong> U.S. economy <strong>and</strong>national security. Fifth, it shouldremind <strong>the</strong> U.S. Government <strong>and</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r stakeholders that infrastructureprotection—<strong>and</strong> undersea cable