Trident-NowhereToGo

17Trident: Nowhere to Goflight control systems, which are replaced on a regular basis. 35 These can be accessed frominside the submarine. The UK only holds a 12-month store of these parts. Whether based inBritain or the United States, the UK cannot continue to operate its nuclear weapons for morethan one year if Washington withdraws its support. The Government were concerned thatthe proposed arrangement would affect the perception of independence. Handling Britishnuclear warheads at King’s Bay would raise public and international awareness of the extent ofdependence. It would also result in discussions in Congress which were best avoided.Kings Bay NavalSubmarine Base,Georgia, USAAny review of future locations for the UK Trident fleet is likely to include this “USbasing”option. Financial savings would be an illusion, given the need to build unique Britishfacilities on an American site, because of the NPT. Moving to an American base wouldraise public awareness, in Britain, America and around the world, of how the British force isdependent on US support.The Trident base at King’s Bay Georgia is spread over a large area. However, it wouldstill be difficult to find space for separate UK nuclear warhead and missile storage. This isbecause of the substantial spacing between explosives handling facilities. The bunkers aresurrounded by a clear area which varies between 700 and 1000 metres in width. The ExplosivesHandling Jetties are 2 kilometres from these bunkers.The Department of Defence are currently considering how far to trim back theirproposals for a new fleet of nuclear-armed submarines. If numbers are substantially reduced,they may decide to close their Atlantic facility and operate all nuclear-armed submarines fromBangor, Washington State, where the majority are currently based. Were this to happen, thenthe only American option for Britain would be to base the Royal Navy Trident fleet on theNorthern fringes of the Pacific Ocean.FranceOn 2 November 2010 two new defence agreements between the UK and France wereannounced. One of these is for a joint nuclear weapon’s research establishment at Epure. Thetwo countries will share the hydrodynamic test facilities, but they will keep separate the data35 “the critical factor so far as our dependence on the US is concerned is the repair of certainspares for the strategic weapon system, and that this is likely to be as true of D5 as it is ofPolaris”. MISC7:Strategic Nuclear Independence, D Brennan, DS17, 13 November 1981, TNADEFE 24-2123 e5. Also DEFE24-2123 e6.