10.07.2015 Views

Faculty Of Health Science The Mark Liveris Health Science

Faculty Of Health Science The Mark Liveris Health Science

Faculty Of Health Science The Mark Liveris Health Science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Paper PresentersOsteoarthritis of the Knee Self-Management Education Program Delivered byMultidisciplinary <strong>Health</strong> Professionals; a Randomised Controlled TrialPresented by: Sophie Coleman, School of PhysiotherapyCourse: Doctor of PhilosophySupervisors: A/Prof. Kathy Briffa, Prof. Joan ColePurpose: To determine whether a disease specific self-management program (OAK) for peoplewith osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, implemented by multidisciplinary health professionals in aprimary health care setting, could achieve and maintain clinically meaningful improvementscompared to a control group.Relevance: Self-management is thought to be an effective strategy in the treatment of chronicillness like OA although there is no robust evidence to support it. OAK is a disease specific OA selfmanagementeducation program designed for delivery by multidisciplinary health professionals toenhance participant’s self-efficacy and promote long-term changes in behaviour. Within theconstructs of self-management, exercise and disease coping strategies are promoted as a meansto improve quality of life, general health and pain.Description: Participants: Medical practitioners referred 146 participants (37 male and 109 female)with established OA knee, mean age of 65 years. Volunteers were excluded for coexistentinflammatory joint disease or serious co-morbidities.Interventions: Participants were randomised into either control or OAK groups (ratio 1:1). <strong>The</strong> OAKgroup completed the six-week self-management education program. <strong>The</strong> control group had a sixmonthwaiting period before receiving the OAK program.Measurements: All participants were assessed at baseline, eight-weeks and six-months. Primaryoutcomes: VAS pain, WOMAC and SF-36 questionnaires were completed. Secondary outcomeswere: a modified “timed get up and go” test, quadriceps and hamstring strength- isometriccontraction assessed using a dynamometer, and knee range of motion (ROM) using a goniometer.Response to treatment was determined using responder and minimal clinically important criteria(MCII).Evaluation: In the OAK group, VAS pain improved during the eight week clinic phase, mean (SE)5.21 (0.30) to 3.65 (0.29) p=

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!