2 UWA<strong>news</strong>VCariousthoughts …One size does not fit allIt took a mighty national push in policy andimplementation across the Commonwealth tocreate the current Australian system <strong>of</strong> highereducation at the end <strong>of</strong> the 1980s.A reforming Federal Minister, in the form <strong>of</strong> UWA graduate,John Dawkins, determinedly pressed his vision <strong>of</strong> a greatlyexpanded university sector — involving the doubling <strong>of</strong>universities both through the transformation <strong>of</strong> Colleges <strong>of</strong>Advanced Education and the amalgamation <strong>of</strong> colleges anduniversities — and a great advance in access, not leastdependent on the new HECS provisions. A national researchcouncil was also brought into being. A major CommonwealthMinistry grew up to oversee, fund and administer this newnational phenomenon <strong>of</strong> the unified national system.A distinctly centralised system had been set in motion, inwhich the best outcomes lay in access and research focus, andthe least attractive aspects in a ‘one size fits all’ funding andpolicy model.That centralising paradigm, and tendency <strong>of</strong> levelling down toa national norm, is in urgent need <strong>of</strong> transforming reform,towards the creation <strong>of</strong> a system <strong>of</strong> genuine diversity andrecognised missions among Australian universities.In all the debate about funding and budgets, that policy thrusthas been far too little discussed. And yet the move towards amore pluralistic system, <strong>of</strong> excellence through diversity <strong>of</strong>choice and institutional initiatives, could be the transforminghallmark <strong>of</strong> the Nelson review initiative.As with micro-reform in the economy at large, theuniversities are ready for an environment <strong>of</strong> much greaterflexibility and freedom, which draws from the capacities <strong>of</strong>universities themselves, recognising the importance <strong>of</strong> a nationalframework <strong>of</strong> operation and accountability for public fundingfrom the Commonwealth.<strong>The</strong>re are fears that such a flexible framework <strong>of</strong> choice, asadvanced strongly by the AVCC, might lead to a hierarchy <strong>of</strong>universities and not a pluralism <strong>of</strong> quality and equal institutions.That could happen in an inappropriate policy framework andfunding mix.UWA<strong>news</strong>EDITOR/WRITERLindy BrophyTel.: 9380 2436 Fax: 9380 1192 Email: lindy.brophy@uwa.edu.auEDITOR-IN-CHIEFColin Campbell-FraserTel: 9380 2889 Fax: 9380 1020 Email: ccampbell@admin.uwa.edu.auDesigned and typeset by <strong>Publications</strong> <strong>Unit</strong>, UWAPrinted by UniPrint, UWAUWA<strong>news</strong> online: www.publishing.uwa.edu.au/uwa<strong>news</strong>/But it should not happen if some fundamental policy and fundingchanges were put in place, namely:• raising the base-funding <strong>of</strong> all universities with significantlymore core funding and more appropriate indexation <strong>of</strong> allaspects <strong>of</strong> that Commonwealth resourcing;• new fully-funded places to meet demand, combined with adynamic model for redistributing places between regions andinstitutions based on demand and mission;• additional research and infrastructure resourcing distributedon the basis <strong>of</strong> highest quality performance;• significant contestable funding aimed to support regionalprovision <strong>of</strong> higher education and major equity initiatives;• flexibility for universities to set a HECS level above (orbelow) a standard rate, coupled with an equivalent volume <strong>of</strong>resources for contestable allocation for those institutionsnot wishing to vary HECS charges; and• support for universities to build their entrepreneurialincomes – in overseas students, industry resources andphilanthropy.Such a major set <strong>of</strong> initiatives would, over a period <strong>of</strong> time,significantly lead to the creation <strong>of</strong> universities that representvery different missions, have very different cost drivers, and thatwish to pursue their own sense <strong>of</strong> development in the future.While all Australian universities could now benefit fromreform <strong>of</strong> policy and reform <strong>of</strong> funding allocations whichrecognises the missions special to each university, UWA is aclassic case <strong>of</strong> a fine university constrained in its growth,performance and potential by the ‘one size fits all’ policyparadigm.<strong>The</strong>re is also a new collaborative role for the States to playin building higher education capacity in their special regions —without lessening Commonwealth responsibilities in corefunding. And there is a great opportunity for theCommonwealth to replace the old policy paradigms andexcessively bureaucratic reporting demands, with a moreresponsive and modern approach.A new century needs a new spirit to shape universityeducation for the changing society in which we live. It isdiversity rather than conformity which will deliver theexcellence which our staff and students deserve.Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Deryck SchreuderVice-Chancellor and Presidentvc@acs.uwa.edu.auTHE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA • 4 NOVEMBER 2002
UWA<strong>news</strong> 3New school,new strategiesextend the visionPr<strong>of</strong>essor D’Arcy Holman sits in an <strong>of</strong>fice in theState Government’s Health Department andcompares the beginnings <strong>of</strong> UWA’sDepartment <strong>of</strong> Public Health in 1991 with the launch <strong>of</strong>our new School <strong>of</strong> Population Health last month.<strong>The</strong> biggest difference is the reputation the School hasdeveloped – reflected in the fact that the Head <strong>of</strong> School is alsonow a key player in the State health system. He is leading ahighly respected and widely recognised school <strong>of</strong> teachers andresearchers who are well on the way to achieving the vision towhich they aspired back then.That vision remains at the top <strong>of</strong> the new school’s strategicinitiatives and it is: We will influence policy and practice to improvethe public health through leadership in education and in the discoveryand communication <strong>of</strong> knowledge.From modest beginnings, the enthusiastic healthpr<strong>of</strong>essionals who made up the Department <strong>of</strong> Public Healthtook on research projects, ran stimulating courses and came upwith innovative programs for public health. <strong>The</strong>y becamerecognised, they were asked for advice and the departmentgrew rapidly during the 1990s, constantly breaking into newareas and proving themselves.“Our position in the health system has consolidated over thepast few years,” Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Holman said. “But now that we arebetter known and more confident, we must be careful not tolose our excitement, not to become complacent. We must bebreaking new ground all the time.”<strong>The</strong> launch <strong>of</strong> the new School, hosted by Acting Vice-Chancellor, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Alan Robson, with the Health MinisterBob Kucera, as the special guest, engendered excitement.Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Fiona Stanley spoke about the importance <strong>of</strong>population health as an academic discipline, Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essorMatthew Knuiman recalled the development <strong>of</strong> the departmentwhich became a School, and Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Holman talked about theSchool’s strategic future.Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Holman’s immediate future is a metaphor for therest <strong>of</strong> the School. It is partly dominated by the reviewcommittees, councils and forums he chairs, as a leader in publichealth policy making. He is currently chairing reviews <strong>of</strong> theMental Health Act and the Mentally Impaired Defenders Act,which involve more than 100 people in the committeestructure.He is President <strong>of</strong> HealthWatch, a standards and surveillancecouncil, and chair <strong>of</strong> the Wagerup Medical Practitioners’ Forum,looking at the health problems associated with the WagerupAlumina Refinery.He is also chair <strong>of</strong> the Data Linkage Committee and has justdrafted a memorandum <strong>of</strong> understanding between the State andFederal governments which will open the way for national healthrecords to be brought into the State’s record linkage project.<strong>The</strong> project, which links the medical records <strong>of</strong> the people <strong>of</strong><strong>Western</strong> Australia is unique in Australia and one <strong>of</strong> only sixsuch systems in the world. It has already provided valuableinformation for the Duty to Care study <strong>of</strong> the physical healthproblems <strong>of</strong> people who use Mental Health services in WA, andthe Quality and Safety <strong>of</strong> Surgical Care project, which evaluatedoutcomes <strong>of</strong> common and important surgical procedures inWA.“<strong>The</strong> new School will build on the successes achievedthrough the collective contribution <strong>of</strong> all our staff, past andpresent, and aims to increase our contribution to the nationaland international research and teaching effort throughpartnership with others,” Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Holman said.“Symbolic <strong>of</strong> this approach is our joint success with theInstitute for Child Health Research in winning the first awardedNational Health and Medical Research Council’s CapacityBuilding Grant.“This will guide the spirit <strong>of</strong> our endeavours over the nextfive years.”Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Alan Robson (left) and Pr<strong>of</strong>essor D’Arcy Holman talk toHealth Minister Bob Kucera (centre) about the new schoolTHE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA • 4 NOVEMBER 2002