10.07.2015 Views

Metacommentating Amos* Metacommentary, what is that ... - Fontes

Metacommentating Amos* Metacommentary, what is that ... - Fontes

Metacommentating Amos* Metacommentary, what is that ... - Fontes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. <strong>Metacommentating</strong> Amos 17Amos’s message was a devastating attack on the social evils of theday, particularly on the heartlessness and d<strong>is</strong>honesty with whichthe rich had ground down the poor . . . , but also on the immoralityand the careless pursuit of luxury which had sapped the nationalcharacter . . . —all of which he viewed as sins <strong>that</strong> Yahweh wouldsurely pun<strong>is</strong>h. 24The metacommentator <strong>is</strong> bound to ask whether modern scholarsare aware of <strong>what</strong> they are doing. They are adopting the view,and presenting it as their own, <strong>that</strong> the best way, or perhaps theonly way, of dealing with heartlessness, d<strong>is</strong>honesty, immoralityand luxury (to adopt Bright’s terms) <strong>is</strong> to wipe the offenders outof ex<strong>is</strong>tence. The metacommentator observes (but <strong>is</strong> notsurpr<strong>is</strong>ed) how, when it <strong>is</strong> the deity who <strong>is</strong> pun<strong>is</strong>hing, highmindedcommentators who would not harm a fly themselvessuddenly join the hanging and flogging brigade and think nopun<strong>is</strong>hment too severe.Nor do the commentators seem to notice the conflict betweenthe apparent justice of pun<strong>is</strong>hing those who deserve it and theobvious injustice of pun<strong>is</strong>hing those who do not. Mays, forexample, can write <strong>that</strong> the ‘prophecy of Amos can be heard asYahweh’s response to their [the poor’s] cry, for the weak andpoor are the special objects of Yahweh’s compassion andconcern’; 25 but at the same time he can say <strong>that</strong> ‘the cons<strong>is</strong>tentburden of h<strong>is</strong> [Amos’s] oracles <strong>is</strong> to announce the d<strong>is</strong>aster <strong>that</strong>will fulfil Yahweh’s decree of an end for h<strong>is</strong> people’. 26 Hedoesn’t seem to notice <strong>that</strong> Yahweh can’t be very compassionateto the poor if he intends them to be carried into exile because ofthe wrongdoing of their leaders, or <strong>that</strong> the prophet’s demandfor justice does not seem to apply to the deity. 2724 . John Bright, A H<strong>is</strong>tory of Israel (London: SCM Press, 3rd edn, 1981),p. 262.25 . Mays, Amos, p. 10.26 . Mays, Amos, p. 9.27 . Here <strong>is</strong> a typical commentatorial utterance on the subject: ‘The conceptionof Yahweh which Amos entertains <strong>is</strong> <strong>that</strong> of a god of justice ...[Amos] makes the idea the very centre of h<strong>is</strong> conception of God ... Righteousnessbeing a vital element in Yahweh’s character, he not only willdemand it in those who profess to be h<strong>is</strong> followers, but will also enforce thedemand ... It <strong>is</strong> a demand for justice, which, in its simplest and most naturalform, includes honesty, integrity, purity, and humanity ... It demands the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!